Can VectorLinux take up the Slack on old hardware?
VectorLinuxThis forum is for the discussion of VectorLinux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Can VectorLinux take up the Slack on old hardware?
You've almost sold me on VectorLinux, as I'm looking for a lightweight distro that can revive older hardware.
As someone who is still very much a newbie, I'm wondering how it would suit someone more used to ubuntu. I've never tried a Slackware-based distro, because Slackware sounds really scary.
Firstly, I'm trying to re-invigorate an old AMD 475MHz, 56Mb, 5Gb hard drive Compaq laptop. Could Vector actually run in that sort of environment and still provide a GUI desktop with basic apps?
(What I'd need for the machine are browser, word-processor, spreadsheet, picture-viewer and even a few simple games.)
Secondly, would I be able to add new applications (not big ones, obviously) with a package manager rather than having to compile from source?
I know the hardware specs are pretty grim and I'm probably asking a lot, but is VectorLinux a viable option? DSL - of course - runs well on the machine but it's not particularly intuitive.
Distribution: Vector Linux 5.1 Std., Vector Linux 5.8 Std., Win2k, XP, OS X (10.4 & 10.5)
Posts: 344
Rep:
For the setup you have, I would suggest Vector 5.1 Standard but with only 56MB it will run really slow. Even with 128 MB Ram it will be somewhat sluggish. However, if you really wanted the exercise you could tune the install so that it will run acceptably well on your hardware.
I've installed VL 5.9 (standard) on a 200mhz pentium mmx laptop with 64 mb of memory. XFCE is kind of slow but there is alot to be said for how well vector linux actually runs on this machine.
Blackbox works nicely but the menu's are setup wrong by default ;-(
The bad points, All but the most basic applications take awhile to start up. Make some tea while starting firefox :-).
xterms start relatively quickly.
Once firefox is started you can actually browse with it but it's not quick, it is usable though. Abiword works fine.
A cool thing. I downloaded the nxclient (remote desktop) package and installed it. With this I can connect to a graphical display on my home machine and actually have a fairly fast interaction w/ my home machine from anywhere!.
I think I had to opt for a low memory install when I put vector on this machine but I don't really remember.
Once firefox is started you can actually browse with it but it's not quick, it is usable though. Abiword works fine.
See ya
Abiword is remarkable in this respect isn't it?
Have you tried Opera? I can't say from personal experience but it is claimed to be less resource-hungry.
I will try some mem tests & report back.
Re: Can VectorLinux take up the Slack on old hardware?
Quote:
Originally Posted by eoinrua
You've almost sold me on VectorLinux, as I'm looking for a lightweight distro that can revive older hardware.
As someone who is still very much a newbie, I'm wondering how it would suit someone more used to ubuntu. I've never tried a Slackware-based distro, because Slackware sounds really scary.
Quote:
Looking forward to hearing from you.
OK, here's one. Someone gave me a Toshiba 7020CT Portege. This is
a Pentium II 366MHz with 128mb ram. I put Vector Linux 5.1 SOHO
on it and so far the results are acceptable. Mostly I wish to
use this machine to process BOINC work units:
for details. Right now I'm using Xfce4 in preference to KDE
but look forward to switching to ICEwm which I remember fondly
from Vector Linux 5.0 SOHO. That said, my own experience is
that Slackware is way easier than it is made out to be.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.