LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Ubuntu
User Name
Password
Ubuntu This forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-15-2011, 08:08 PM   #1
K.out
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Posts: 23

Rep: Reputation: 1
Question Ubuntu 10.10 64bit graphics worse than the 32bit graphics


Hello,

I was wondering if anybody else felt that the graphics (i.e. title bar and task bar) are a lot nicer in the 32 bit version of Ubuntu 10.10. I have installed both versions on different machines, and I think that the graphics in the 32 bit look a lot nicer.


Does anybody else share this preference? Are they supposed to be different?


Thanks,
K.out
 
Old 01-15-2011, 08:35 PM   #2
paulsm4
Guru
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Distribution: SusE 8.2
Posts: 5,863
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Q: What specifically do you prefer in one version vs. the other?

Q: Are there any options to customize your preferences?

PS:
I'm running the 32-bit version of Ubuntu 10.10 on my 32-bit laptop. I would have thought the 32- and 64-bit versions of the same package would have looked identical - but I guess I would have been mistaken .

Please elaborate.

Last edited by paulsm4; 01-15-2011 at 08:36 PM.
 
Old 01-15-2011, 09:25 PM   #3
K.out
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Posts: 23

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1
I prefer the appearance of the 32 bit version. The only options availabale that I saw were in system->preferences->appearance, and that didn't seem to change what I wanted.

I also kind of expected them to appear the same. If not, I expected 64 bit to have nicer graphics. However, my version of ubuntu 10.10 64 bit has a bland grey title bar and task bar.
 
Old 01-16-2011, 05:32 AM   #4
Snark1994
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2010
Location: Wales, UK
Distribution: Arch
Posts: 1,632
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 345Reputation: 345Reputation: 345Reputation: 345
If you mean the difference shown in my screenshot, then that's a problem with your themes. Both are on 64-bit Ubuntu, the left one tries to use a theme engine I don't have installed (I think it's lightning, I can't remember). Is this the difference you're referring to?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Screenshot.jpg (197.2 KB, 11 views)
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 01-23-2011, 10:51 AM   #5
K.out
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Posts: 23

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1
Yeah, that was exactly the difference I was talking about. Thank you.
 
  


Reply

Tags
graphics, ubuntu+10.10


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Graphics & sound problem w/ Ubuntu 64bit on HP dv4t 1300 astrospek25 Linux - Laptop and Netbook 1 08-07-2009 05:40 PM
Intel Atom 330 - Ubuntu 64bit or 32bit n.lindberg Linux - Hardware 9 03-21-2009 06:58 PM
Setting up my ATI graphics card on FC5 64bit 144419855310001 Fedora 15 05-12-2006 06:22 AM
Graphics display distorted on notebook with 32bit TC driver rjb Linux - Newbie 2 02-21-2006 05:33 PM
Graphics: 24/32bit doesn't work Mr_Zet Linux - Hardware 9 01-30-2005 05:35 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration