UbuntuThis forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
First of all, I'm not very knowledgable with Linux at all, but I have a very good knownledge of windows, hardware, and general PC concepts.
I've had lots of problems with ACPI Linux Support and my IBM R40e Laptop. I've not installed any distro without having to disable ACPI (I've tried several distro's recently), and only ever semi-sorted out ACPI on Novell Linux Desktop 9, by moving files in /lib/modules/{kernelver}/kernel/drivers/acpi/ (I think processor.ko and thermal.ko come to mind).
Now, I've install ubuntu (5.04 hoarty preview) and my initial impressions are good, so I want to keep it, thus I want ACPI sorted. I went into the folder above, and noticed an IBM_acpi.ko file. I think this must have been added with later kernels, and I'm guessing default kernel configurations don't load the hardware specific modules (such as toshiba, asus, IBM etc.).
I'm wanting step by step instructions on how to fix this if it is possible. I'm not sure whether I have to change a config file to load the modules, or recompile the kernel. If I do need to recompile the kernel, sould you also provide help to do that.
I don't remember all the steps I used to successfully get ACPI working on my Asus M3N laptop with debian...but a big factor is adjusting the boot parameters.
Make sure you have 'acpi=on' and 'nolapic'. I forget what nolapic does but it's really important for acpi working
I'm using LILO as my boot manager so the file I had to edit was /etc/lilo.conf and then of course I had to run 'lilo' from the prompt to update the settings I made.
Originally posted by leif81 I don't remember all the steps I used to successfully get ACPI working on my Asus M3N laptop with debian...but a big factor is adjusting the boot parameters.
Make sure you have 'acpi=on' and 'nolapic'. I forget what nolapic does but it's really important for acpi working
I'm using LILO as my boot manager so the file I had to edit was /etc/lilo.conf and then of course I had to run 'lilo' from the prompt to update the settings I made.
Maybe this will help.
I have acpi=off in my boot parameters, because it won't boot without it. What I'm wanting to do is make ACPI the best it can for battery and AC status (I've had it working in another distro by moving the processor.ko and thermal.ko ACPI modules)
there is a kernel patch described Here, but I don't know how or where to apply this (location of kernel sources?)
Your kernel sources should be in /usr/src/. Poke around in there for them.
With my Asus laptop I had to install some kernel modules called acpi4asus.
Did you try acpi=on with the additional parameter 'nolapic' ? Because that is very key. Mine would not boot with acpi=on until i additionally included the nolapic parameter.
Originally posted by nikor There is a solution to your problem on this site: http://pc.freeshell.org/tp/
Good luck
thanks, but I had already pointed out this site in an earlier post. My question was how to APPLY the fix listed. I have no idea about kernel compilingand all related stuff. I was kinda wanting a definative guide on kernel compiling or some steps on how to recompile it specific to Ubuntu.
I still experience the problem on all distributions on linux. It's kinda put me off buying IBM stuff again. Intrestingly enough, SuSE 9.3 installed without having to disable ACPI, but once installed started to hang on startup again. it seems SuSE 9.3 uses a kernel that implements the fix listed on the page above, but only during installation??? strange.
Anyway, Linux seems to be causing me too many headaches on this laptop, so I think I'll give up for now. See what the future of linux desktop brings before trying again.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.