| Ubuntu This forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
09-11-2011, 03:55 PM
|
#1
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2010
Posts: 11
Rep:
|
Overwriting the Ubuntu 64 bit partition with installation of 32 bit version
Hello. I just installed Ubuntu 64 bit 11.04 on my new PC and I'm not very happy with it.
Found out that installing video drivers is a drag everytime a new kernel version comes around, and with the 32 bit version everything seems just easier. And I need Ubuntu to work with the development of intense graphic applications, which should be better to work on a 32 bit environment.
So here is my question: is it possible to overwrite the existing Ubuntu installed with another installation of it, now with 32-bit instead of 64? I don't want to keep using the 64 bit one, so I am just fine with deleting it.
Thanks for the attention, sorry for my horrible english.
|
|
|
|
09-11-2011, 04:09 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2008
Location: S.E. Montana
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 1,663
|
Just tell the installer to use that partition (or better, partitions) and it will do the thing just fine.
|
|
|
|
09-11-2011, 04:10 PM
|
#3
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 12,118
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brantkings
Found out that installing video drivers is a drag everytime a new kernel version comes around, and with the 32 bit version everything seems just easier.
|
If you use the drivers from the manufacturer's website instead of the ones in the repositories you will have this problem, regardless if you use 32 or 64 bit.
Quote:
|
And I need Ubuntu to work with the development of intense graphic applications, which should be better to work on a 32 bit environment.
|
Depends on what you are using for applications. 3D rendering, encoding videos and other "numbercrunching" work will run faster on a 64 bit system, you also should have benefits from the increased RAM limits when working with very large pictures.
If it comes to the performance of the graphics card it shouldn't matter if you use 32 or 64 bit.
Quote:
|
is it possible to overwrite the existing Ubuntu installed with another installation of it, now with 32-bit instead of 64?
|
Yes.
|
|
|
|
09-11-2011, 04:28 PM
|
#4
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2010
Posts: 11
Original Poster
Rep:
|
There aren't no 64-bit drivers in the repository, so there's the whole problem. And the most recent driver for my card still thinks the kernel is on it's 2.4s. So I figured out just to use 32-bit and that's it.
Thanks for the reply, folks!
|
|
|
|
09-11-2011, 04:37 PM
|
#5
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 12,118
|
Just out of curiosity, may I ask which graphics card you are using?
|
|
|
|
09-11-2011, 08:07 PM
|
#6
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jun 2010
Posts: 11
Original Poster
Rep:
|
Yep it is Nvidia GeForce GT 540M. Guess it should be easier to install its driver, but as a newbie I am struggling.
I forgot to ask something. I have a dualboot (with Windows). Is it possible that the overwrite of the partition mess up with Grub (because it is gonna be overwritten by another Grub) and make any OS inaccessible? Should I take any precautions or something?
Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
09-11-2011, 10:45 PM
|
#7
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Sep 2011
Location: Germany
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 9
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by brantkings
I forgot to ask something. I have a dualboot (with Windows). Is it possible that the overwrite of the partition mess up with Grub (because it is gonna be overwritten by another Grub) and make any OS inaccessible? Should I take any precautions or something?
Thanks again.
|
I think it should work just fine, install Ubuntu alongside Windows and overwrite the older version of Ubuntu. The version of Grub is anyway the same, you are just changing the architecture.
But of course, make a backup of all your data and files!
|
|
|
|
09-12-2011, 11:12 AM
|
#8
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Hanover, Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 12,118
|
The GT 540M uses the same driver as most other modern NVidia cards, so the drivers from the repositories (regardless of 32 or 64 bit) should work fine with it. If you use that drivers there is no need to re-install the driver when the kernel is changed.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|