| Ubuntu This forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux. |
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
08-20-2010, 11:05 AM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: firenze
Distribution: ubuntu
Posts: 106
Rep:
|
Old fashioned usplash unlike plymouth
Hi all,
I've installed recently Lucid Lynx. I detest the plymouth splash and I'd like to know if I can use the dear old usplash of Edgy. If yes, where can I download it and above all how can I run it on Grub2? I have a Nvidia Geforce gtx260 for a Philips 220WS flat monitor. These are the resolution Lucid found:
Code:
djangou@ESPERYDES:~$ sudo hwinfo --framebuffer
[sudo] password for djangou:
02: None 00.0: 11001 VESA Framebuffer
[Created at bios.464]
Unique ID: rdCR.tvl4Tad3xF8
Hardware Class: framebuffer
Model: "NVIDIA GT200 Board - 0651s009"
Vendor: "NVIDIA Corporation"
Device: "GT200 Board - 0651s009"
SubVendor: "NVIDIA"
SubDevice:
Revision: "Chip Rev"
Memory Size: 14 MB
Memory Range: 0xf9000000-0xf9dfffff (rw)
Mode 0x0300: 640x400 (+640), 8 bits
Mode 0x0301: 640x480 (+640), 8 bits
Mode 0x0303: 800x600 (+800), 8 bits
Mode 0x0305: 1024x768 (+1024), 8 bits
Mode 0x0307: 1280x1024 (+1280), 8 bits
Mode 0x030e: 320x200 (+640), 16 bits
Mode 0x030f: 320x200 (+1280), 24 bits
Mode 0x0311: 640x480 (+1280), 16 bits
Mode 0x0312: 640x480 (+2560), 24 bits
Mode 0x0314: 800x600 (+1600), 16 bits
Mode 0x0315: 800x600 (+3200), 24 bits
Mode 0x0317: 1024x768 (+2048), 16 bits
Mode 0x0318: 1024x768 (+4096), 24 bits
Mode 0x031a: 1280x1024 (+2560), 16 bits
Mode 0x031b: 1280x1024 (+5120), 24 bits
Mode 0x0330: 320x200 (+320), 8 bits
Mode 0x0331: 320x400 (+320), 8 bits
Mode 0x0332: 320x400 (+640), 16 bits
Mode 0x0333: 320x400 (+1280), 24 bits
Mode 0x0334: 320x240 (+320), 8 bits
Mode 0x0335: 320x240 (+640), 16 bits
Mode 0x0336: 320x240 (+1280), 24 bits
Mode 0x033d: 640x400 (+1280), 16 bits
Mode 0x033e: 640x400 (+2560), 24 bits
Mode 0x0345: 1600x1200 (+1600), 8 bits
Mode 0x0346: 1600x1200 (+3200), 16 bits
Mode 0x0347: 1400x1050 (+1400), 8 bits
Mode 0x0348: 1400x1050 (+2800), 16 bits
Mode 0x0349: 1400x1050 (+5600), 24 bits
Mode 0x034a: 1600x1200 (+6400), 24 bits
Mode 0x0352: 2048x1536 (+8192), 24 bits
Mode 0x0360: 1280x800 (+1280), 8 bits
Mode 0x0361: 1280x800 (+5120), 24 bits
Mode 0x0362: 768x480 (+768), 8 bits
Mode 0x0364: 1440x900 (+1440), 8 bits
Mode 0x0365: 1440x900 (+5760), 24 bits
Mode 0x0368: 1680x1050 (+1680), 8 bits
Mode 0x0369: 1680x1050 (+6720), 24 bits
Mode 0x037b: 1280x720 (+5120), 24 bits
Mode 0x037c: 1920x1200 (+1920), 8 bits
Mode 0x037d: 1920x1200 (+7680), 24 bits
The Nvidia Settings displays Mode 0x0369: 1680x1050 (+6720), 24 bits as my current resolution.
Enrico Dini,
Firenze
Italy
|
|
|
|
08-22-2010, 05:30 AM
|
#2
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: Florida, Occupied CSA
Distribution: Xubuntu
Posts: 98
Rep:
|
Perhaps you can by editing /etc/default/grub to use usplash, but here's the thing.
Plymouth is more than just a graphical boot-splash app. It's evil tentacles reach into just about everything else in the entire system! I mean "hard dependency." To see what I mean, just mark Plymouth for removal in Synaptic but don't click apply! Just look the huge list of stuff "to be removed" - it lists at least half of the OS!
This was not true of previous versions. But I guess gaining a fraction of a second faster boot time was the top priority for Lucid. It's too bad they chose a LTS version for this experimentation.
-Robin
|
|
|
|
08-22-2010, 06:36 AM
|
#3
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario,Canada
Distribution: Linux Mint13 Cinnamon
Posts: 175
Rep: 
|
replace purple ubuntu lucid screen
This doesn't let you completely change that depressing purple/moving dot startup screen, but the following lines entered in Terminal will change the purple to a much nicer light blue. Thanks to allarem for this (cannot remember where I saw it):
sudo gedit /lib/plymouth/themes/ubuntu-logo/ubuntu-logo.script
at approximately line 160, you can change the values for the Window.SetBackground lines to light blue with:
Window.SetBackgroundTopColor (0.34, 0.72, 0.91);
Window.SetBackgroundBottomColor (0.47, 0.77, 0.91);
I'm still hoping to have the entire startup animation theme changed. Maybe this could be done in a future lucid update (hint, please)
|
|
|
|
08-22-2010, 12:18 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Feb 2010
Location: /usa/ca/orange_county/lake_forest
Distribution: ArchBang, Google Android 2.1 + Motoblur (on Motortola Flipside), Google Chrome OS (on Cr-48)
Posts: 1,791
Rep:
|
Found those functions on lines 166 and 167. Now I'll reboot and see just what it does.
|
|
|
|
08-31-2010, 02:22 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: firenze
Distribution: ubuntu
Posts: 106
Original Poster
Rep:
|
sorry for my long disconnection. Finally I've had success in loading plymouth. It's true that it is more than a simple splash theme and the prove is that it was very difficult for me to make it working. Since I've not enough secure I think I'll keep plymouth as is.
Thanks anyway.

|
|
|
|
08-31-2010, 03:13 PM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2008
Distribution: Debian Testing
Posts: 99
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dixiedancer
Plymouth is more than just a graphical boot-splash app. It's evil tentacles reach into just about everything else in the entire system! I mean "hard dependency." To see what I mean, just mark Plymouth for removal in Synaptic but don't click apply! Just look the huge list of stuff "to be removed" - it lists at least half of the OS!
|
Couldn't agree more. such wild dependency is totally wrong, for something that play only in pre fstab mounting phrase. What worse, the package maintainer just refuse to fix it. See LP# 556372.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dixiedancer
This was not true of previous versions. But I guess gaining a fraction of a second faster boot time was the top priority for Lucid
|
faster? I really doubt it. I remove it and my machine is sure not wasting time drawing that animated dots during boot up.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:48 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|