UbuntuThis forum is for the discussion of Ubuntu Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
hi - i really don't think you want to be messing with the kernel if this is your 'main' computer.. if you want to experiment, buy an old machine off eBay purely for messing with. that's what i do - if i break something, it doesn't matter.... compiling kernels is fairly straightforward, but there are plenty of 'gotchas' and you might find it all a bit too much to begin with.
as for speed issues.. well, i tried suse 10.1 a few weeks back (on my 'scratch' machine) and it looks like it pre-loads a number of applications into memory upon boot, much the same as windows does. so start-up times for firefox, openoffice, etc were very impressive.. ubuntu doesn't do that, so starting firefox from cold, for instance, will take some time. i still far prefer ubuntu overall to suse, but i was quite impressed with suse's performance.
Distribution: Ubuntu,(Feisty Fawn) Windows XP(Home Edition)
Posts: 634
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinatkins
randell,
hi - i really don't think you want to be messing with the kernel if this is your 'main' computer.. if you want to experiment, buy an old machine off eBay purely for messing with. that's what i do - if i break something, it doesn't matter.... compiling kernels is fairly straightforward, but there are plenty of 'gotchas' and you might find it all a bit too much to begin with.
as for speed issues.. well, i tried suse 10.1 a few weeks back (on my 'scratch' machine) and it looks like it pre-loads a number of applications into memory upon boot, much the same as windows does. so start-up times for firefox, openoffice, etc were very impressive.. ubuntu doesn't do that, so starting firefox from cold, for instance, will take some time. i still far prefer ubuntu overall to suse, but i was quite impressed with suse's performance.
THANKS! Yeah I have an old box that I use to test different distro's.
I actually went out and BOUGHT Suse 9.3 a while back and I will say that the Graphics are Beautiful but she is way too slow for my taste, and took up WAY too much space! (5 fricken cd's!)
I'm going to leave the kernel to the pros and wait for them to send it to me. (although I might just try compiling on my old box)
if u install a new kernel and something dosent work out right..u can always revert to a older revision ( make sure your grub.conf is saved prior to new kernel install)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.