2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2005 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2005. This is your chance to be heard! Voting ends March 6th. |
|
View Poll Results: Web Development Editor of the Year
|
|
Quanta
|
  
|
354 |
44.31% |
|
Bluefish
|
  
|
172 |
21.53% |
|
Ginf
|
  
|
2 |
0.25% |
|
Screem
|
  
|
23 |
2.88% |
|
Nvu
|
  
|
199 |
24.91% |
|
Mozilla Composer
|
  
|
49 |
6.13% |
 |
|
01-28-2006, 03:11 PM
|
#1
|
root 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 6,434
|
Web Development Editor of the Year
[ Log in to get rid of this advertisement]
What is your web editor of choice?
--jeremy
|
|
|
|
|
01-29-2006, 01:25 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: Sebec, ME, USA
Distribution: Debian Etch, Windows XP Home, FreeBSD
Posts: 1,445
|
NVU! I prefer HTML coding, but even still, a dreamweaver clone
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-29-2006, 02:27 PM
|
#3
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: FreeBSD, openSUSE, CentOS
Posts: 15,787
|
Quanta gets my vote because of the CSS editor but Bluefish came a close second.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-29-2006, 08:20 PM
|
#4
|
|
Newbie
Registered: Jan 2005
Posts: 20
|
Quanta by a mile, Bluefish is alright. Nvu is horribly buggy and uses a slow XUL toolkit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-29-2006, 09:12 PM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Debian (testing)
Posts: 2,592
|
Quanta is my editor of choice simply because of its convenient auto-completion of HTML code and PHP coding assistance and its advanced CSS editor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 12:51 AM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Lithuania
Distribution: Hybrid
Posts: 2,050
|
Bluefish, from their website
Quote:
|
Lightweight - Bluefish uses on startup 40%-45% of the memory that other editors such as Quanta and Screem use, and during a full session closer to 33% of what these other editors use.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 03:31 AM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Lelystad, NL
Distribution: Debian Etch
Posts: 123
|
Bluefish, I don't like WYSIWYG apps
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 11:20 AM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2002
Location: 127.0.0.1
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD, FreeBSD
Posts: 275
|
Bluefish for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 12:43 PM
|
#9
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2005
Location: Greece
Distribution: antiX, Mepis 3.4.3, Sidux, Debian Sid. All using fluxbox.
Posts: 165
|
Bluefish
for the reasons Alien_Hominid point out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 01:45 PM
|
#10
|
|
Newbie
Registered: Oct 2003
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 16
|
Quanta. KIO-Slaves and features others have already pointed out make it a winner for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 01:59 PM
|
#11
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Odense, Denmark / Citizen of the Web
Distribution: Slackware 12.1 & ArchLinux
Posts: 763
|
While I use Bluefish and like it very much, I feel that NVU has evolved at an impressive rate in recent years, so it deserves to be the app of the year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 03:02 PM
|
#12
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Puerto Rico
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 176
|
I have to give it up to nvu development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 03:59 PM
|
#13
|
|
Newbie
Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Hattiesburg, MS, USA
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 21
|
NVU may still need a lot of work, but a WYSIWYG editor is just so much more natural for such a visual medium as web design...
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 07:02 PM
|
#14
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2004
Location: USA
Distribution: Arch Linux
Posts: 190
|
still sticking with quanta
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-30-2006, 11:51 PM
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Bawstun area
Distribution: Suse (10.2, 10.3), CentOS, and Ubuntu
Posts: 1,796
|
Quanta by far and away, although I have to say that Seamonkey produces some fairly clean HTML as far as WYSIWYG editors go.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:29 AM.
|
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
|
 Latest Threads
LQ News
LQ Podcast
LQ Radio
|
|
