2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2004. This is your chance to be heard! Voting closes on February 3rd. |
|
View Poll Results: Web Development Editor of the Year
|
|
Quanta
|
 
|
348 |
50.88% |
|
Bluefish
|
 
|
165 |
24.12% |
|
Ginf
|
 
|
0 |
0% |
|
Screem
|
 
|
32 |
4.68% |
|
Nvu
|
 
|
94 |
13.74% |
|
Mozilla Composer
|
 
|
45 |
6.58% |
12-30-2004, 07:51 PM
|
#1
|
root 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 6,457
|
Web Development Editor of the Year
[ Log in to get rid of this advertisement]
A close award two years running.
|
|
|
|
12-31-2004, 02:43 AM
|
#2
|
|
Guru
Registered: May 2003
Location: INDIA
Distribution: Debian, RHEL ,Slackware ,Suse
Posts: 5,503
|
mozilla composer is the best WYUSIWUG editor
|
|
|
|
12-31-2004, 03:03 AM
|
#3
|
|
Moderator
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: FreeBSD, openSUSE, CentOS
Posts: 15,865
|
Quanta rules, in my opinion. Bluefish comes a close second.
|
|
|
|
12-31-2004, 04:18 AM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Debian (testing)
Posts: 2,598
|
Quanta. It's autocomplete for HTML and PHP is great.
|
|
|
|
12-31-2004, 08:30 AM
|
#5
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: the Netherlands
Distribution: debian SID
Posts: 2,169
|
I use Quanta now. I like it over Bluefish because of some small things.
|
|
|
|
12-31-2004, 08:37 AM
|
#6
|
|
Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Odense, Denmark / Citizen of the Web
Distribution: Slackware 12.1 & ArchLinux
Posts: 767
|
I like Screem and Bluefish, but actually... I do most of the work in GEdit.
|
|
|
|
12-31-2004, 07:06 PM
|
#7
|
|
Newbie
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Oregon
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 11
|
Thanks to all Quanta users for voting us number one last year. If you haven't tried Quanta lately you should. 3.3 is very nice and 3.4 is just around the corner. The Visual Page Layout is getting more attention and maturity than ever before. PHP object and local auto completion is in work in CVS. Kommander has become a serious tool for extending Quanta and writing custom tools in 3.3 and will be one of the best secrets on the desktop in 3.4. The whole Quanta package is now the kdewebdev application suite with a link checker, imagemap editor and XSL debugger. The new Event Actions mean you can emulate just about any feature you can imagine as well as do serious automation and there are a lot of other new features.
I can't help but wonder if a lot of people who like Quanta still don't know half of the cool things it can do. ;-) Hopefully we can expose this power better along with KNewStuff and other features on our new site we're building. Enjoy!
|
|
|
|
12-31-2004, 11:55 PM
|
#8
|
|
Newbie
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: New England, USA
Distribution: Redhat
Posts: 4
|
I love quanta +... and I don't even run KDE, just Quanta. Its amazingly good at blending in to your work... To be honest I don't really appreciate it until I've spent 7 or 8 hours doing php / html /css and stop... then I am amazed at how transparent and perfectly adapted it is to me. I dont really even notice it while working... It lets me work without saying stuff like:"boy I wish the editor would / would not do this" or "boy this is bad" or "I really miss homesite". Quanta is it.
Quanta has everything that I have ever wished for. I only voted in one category here and this was it (would have done two, but fluxbox was not listed).
Try Quanta... Its really really nice...
|
|
|
|
01-01-2005, 05:01 AM
|
#9
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Jiangsu, China
Distribution: Debian unstable
Posts: 10
|
Mozilla Composer !
Bluefish sometimes
|
|
|
|
01-01-2005, 05:25 AM
|
#10
|
|
Member
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Distribution: Arch Linux & Gentoo Linux
Posts: 116
|
Their is nothing like Quanta Plus in FOSS world still.
Bulefish is good, but need few improvements.
|
|
|
|
01-01-2005, 12:54 PM
|
#11
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Amsterdam (NL)
Distribution: FC3 (laptop), FC4 (home desktop), Ubuntu 5.10 (work)
Posts: 33
|
vi, of course...
|
|
|
|
01-01-2005, 06:57 PM
|
#12
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Slovenia
Distribution: Mandriva Linux
Posts: 58
|
Quanta
|
|
|
|
01-01-2005, 07:30 PM
|
#13
|
|
Newbie
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 5
|
Both Quanta+ and Nvu (wish Nvu was faster though) are good. Nvu, however, was very useful when it came to fixing broken HTML.
|
|
|
|
01-01-2005, 09:54 PM
|
#14
|
|
Member
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: New Jersey, US
Distribution: Mandrake 10.1, SuSE 9.2, DSL
Posts: 30
|
kate in Linux, notepad in windows
thats how we 'elite' teenagers do it nowadays
|
|
|
|
01-01-2005, 11:53 PM
|
#15
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2003
Distribution: Fedora Core 3, Gentoo
Posts: 47
|
ssh, ssl, scp, etc
I cannot figure out how to connect to a server 'securely' using Quanta. I believe I will make a thread about that but I wanted to point it out here. Other than that, I voted for Quanta because it's a very useful program.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 PM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
LQ Podcast
LQ Radio
|
|