LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.

Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.

You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!

Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.

Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto | Site FAQ | Sitemap | Register Now

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.

Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards
User Name
Password
2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards This forum is for the 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards.
You can now vote for your favorite products of 2004. This is your chance to be heard! Voting closes on February 3rd.

View Poll Results: Web Development Editor of the Year
Quanta 348 50.88%
Bluefish 165 24.12%
Ginf 0 0%
Screem 32 4.68%
Nvu 94 13.74%
Mozilla Composer 45 6.58%
Voters: 684. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-30-2004, 07:51 PM   #1
jeremy
root
 
Registered: Jun 2000
Distribution: Debian, Red Hat, Slackware, Fedora, Ubuntu
Posts: 6,457
Web Development Editor of the Year


[Log in to get rid of this advertisement]
A close award two years running.
jeremy is offline    
Old 12-31-2004, 02:43 AM   #2
masand
Guru
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: INDIA
Distribution: Debian, RHEL ,Slackware ,Suse
Posts: 5,503
mozilla composer is the best WYUSIWUG editor
masand is offline    
Old 12-31-2004, 03:03 AM   #3
reddazz
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: N. E. England
Distribution: FreeBSD, openSUSE, CentOS
Posts: 15,865
Quanta rules, in my opinion. Bluefish comes a close second.
reddazz is offline    
Old 12-31-2004, 04:18 AM   #4
harishankar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Debian (testing)
Posts: 2,598
Quanta. It's autocomplete for HTML and PHP is great.
harishankar is offline    
Old 12-31-2004, 08:30 AM   #5
darkleaf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: the Netherlands
Distribution: debian SID
Posts: 2,169
I use Quanta now. I like it over Bluefish because of some small things.
darkleaf is offline    
Old 12-31-2004, 08:37 AM   #6
mjjzf
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Odense, Denmark / Citizen of the Web
Distribution: Slackware 12.1 & ArchLinux
Posts: 767
I like Screem and Bluefish, but actually... I do most of the work in GEdit.
mjjzf is offline    
Old 12-31-2004, 07:06 PM   #7
sequitur
Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Oregon
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 11
Thanks to all Quanta users for voting us number one last year. If you haven't tried Quanta lately you should. 3.3 is very nice and 3.4 is just around the corner. The Visual Page Layout is getting more attention and maturity than ever before. PHP object and local auto completion is in work in CVS. Kommander has become a serious tool for extending Quanta and writing custom tools in 3.3 and will be one of the best secrets on the desktop in 3.4. The whole Quanta package is now the kdewebdev application suite with a link checker, imagemap editor and XSL debugger. The new Event Actions mean you can emulate just about any feature you can imagine as well as do serious automation and there are a lot of other new features.

I can't help but wonder if a lot of people who like Quanta still don't know half of the cool things it can do. ;-) Hopefully we can expose this power better along with KNewStuff and other features on our new site we're building. Enjoy!
sequitur is offline    
Old 12-31-2004, 11:55 PM   #8
wbchmura
Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: New England, USA
Distribution: Redhat
Posts: 4
I love quanta +... and I don't even run KDE, just Quanta. Its amazingly good at blending in to your work... To be honest I don't really appreciate it until I've spent 7 or 8 hours doing php / html /css and stop... then I am amazed at how transparent and perfectly adapted it is to me. I dont really even notice it while working... It lets me work without saying stuff like:"boy I wish the editor would / would not do this" or "boy this is bad" or "I really miss homesite". Quanta is it.

Quanta has everything that I have ever wished for. I only voted in one category here and this was it (would have done two, but fluxbox was not listed).

Try Quanta... Its really really nice...
wbchmura is offline    
Old 01-01-2005, 05:01 AM   #9
Lindlar
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Jiangsu, China
Distribution: Debian unstable
Posts: 10
Mozilla Composer !
Bluefish sometimes
Lindlar is offline    
Old 01-01-2005, 05:25 AM   #10
kesara
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Distribution: Arch Linux & Gentoo Linux
Posts: 116
Their is nothing like Quanta Plus in FOSS world still.
Bulefish is good, but need few improvements.
kesara is offline    
Old 01-01-2005, 12:54 PM   #11
Heinz
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Amsterdam (NL)
Distribution: FC3 (laptop), FC4 (home desktop), Ubuntu 5.10 (work)
Posts: 33
vi, of course...
Heinz is offline    
Old 01-01-2005, 06:57 PM   #12
JLP
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Slovenia
Distribution: Mandriva Linux
Posts: 58
Quanta
JLP is offline    
Old 01-01-2005, 07:30 PM   #13
chessforce
Newbie
 
Registered: Aug 2004
Posts: 5
Both Quanta+ and Nvu (wish Nvu was faster though) are good. Nvu, however, was very useful when it came to fixing broken HTML.
chessforce is offline    
Old 01-01-2005, 09:54 PM   #14
X Predator X
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: New Jersey, US
Distribution: Mandrake 10.1, SuSE 9.2, DSL
Posts: 30
kate in Linux, notepad in windows

thats how we 'elite' teenagers do it nowadays
X Predator X is offline    
Old 01-01-2005, 11:53 PM   #15
oneferna
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Distribution: Fedora Core 3, Gentoo
Posts: 47
ssh, ssl, scp, etc

I cannot figure out how to connect to a server 'securely' using Quanta. I believe I will make a thread about that but I wanted to point it out here. Other than that, I voted for Quanta because it's a very useful program.
oneferna is offline    

 

Submit thread to Digg | Submit thread to del.icio.us | Submit to LQ Bookmarks

« Back to Top »

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Editor of the Year jeremy 2004 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 127 04-03-2005 04:52 PM
Web Development Editor of the Year jeremy 2003 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 72 02-18-2004 03:52 PM
Editor of the Year jeremy 2003 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 75 02-07-2004 01:35 PM
Editor of the Year jeremy 2002 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 2 01-07-2003 08:50 PM
Web Development Editor of the Year jeremy 2002 LinuxQuestions.org Members Choice Awards 0 01-07-2003 08:47 PM



Add LQ To Your Yahoo Add LQ To Your Google Add LQ To Your MSN Add LQ To Your Blog
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
RSS2  LQ Podcast
RSS2  LQ Radio
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration