LXer: Windows 10 to make the Secure Boot alt-OS lock out a reality
Syndicated Linux NewsThis forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
LXer: Windows 10 to make the Secure Boot alt-OS lock out a reality
Published at LXer:
Recall a barrage of complaints in the run up to Windows 8's launch that concerned the ability to install other operating systems—whether they be older versions of Windows, or alternatives such as Linux or FreeBSD—on hardware that sported a "Designed for Windows 8" logo.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
Note that M$ don't require "secure boot" to be the only option and that Windows 10 still runs without "secure boot" enabled. Don't get me wrong, this is a bad move on M$'s part and could cause problems in future. However, once Windows 10 has the keylogging removed from the license I'll be upgrading my Windows 8 machines straight away as it's far less annoying than Windows 8 to use so if I must use Windows I'll use a less annoying version at least.
Distribution: Debian Sid AMD64, Raspbian Wheezy, various VMs
Posts: 7,680
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by John VV
the "bate and switch" was EXPECTED
i do not "own" a copy of win7
and i do not plan on "owning" a 8 or 10 install
And i was hopping that
"We are the Microsoft , resistance is futile , you will be assimilated...." would come to an end
To quote myself form another thread:
Quote:
Originally Posted by 273
Sadly this isn't an easy option in most countries and means buying very specific laptops from certain brands only with very little choice.
Personally, since I had to buy Windows 8* and the laptop I bought has a 1TB hard drive, I went for dual boot at the moment so that any warranty claim will be easier and for the odd program I want to use which requires Windows -- at the moment that is only Amazon Video but should I apply for any new jobs soon I will likely need Windows at some point in the application process (I know I did for my current position).
*Technically, in a lot of cases, OEM discount from Microsoft, the inclusion of third-party programs and having no need to support any other OS actually makes Windows virtually free for OEMs, hence its ubiquity. This also explains the much broader choice of less expensive Windows machines.
Step 1. Require Secureboot, including "option for users to turn it off".
Step 2. Make 'option to turn it off' optional.
Step 3. Offer hardware vendor bulk discounts on Windows license if they choose the option of removing the option to disable secureboot.
Step 4. Profit.
... but, no need for alarm... because, it's only an option!
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.