LinuxQuestions.org
Register a domain and help support LQ
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > Linux - News > Syndicated Linux News
User Name
Password
Syndicated Linux News This forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 12-09-2005, 05:48 PM   #1
LXer
LXer NewsBot
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 74,067

Rep: Reputation: 82
LXer: Wikipedia's open-source label conundrum


Published at LXer:

Despite a media habit of referring to Wikipedia as an open-source project, it looks only a little like the open source projects common in software.

Read More...
 
Old 12-10-2005, 12:51 AM   #2
Fireball7
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Distribution: Slackware 10.2, Ubuntu 6.06
Posts: 46

Rep: Reputation: 15
Interesting....I wonder what wiki is going to do about the accountability issues in the long run.
 
Old 12-10-2005, 04:58 PM   #3
xanas3712
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2004
Distribution: Slackware/Mandrake/Debian (sarge)
Posts: 266

Rep: Reputation: 30
Well, making people register to edit/create articles is a good idea, I think. Perhaps in the future they could add some features for users to authenticate themselves. I really don't feel in articles you want to be held to a higher standard that you should need anonimity. On the other hand, there may be a lot of good contributions that would not occur without this.

I do know this much, reports against the credibility of wikipedia are generally overplayed. I find a great deal of good information there all the time. I'm really surprised at how thorough articles are on most subjects. It is definetly a good and useful resource.

I would advise people never to accept a single source for anything, especially subjects which are common to have bias in. So if it deals with politics or controversial issues, then taking wikipedia with a grain of salt is a good idea. I still think it's useful in many cases there, but realize that what is said may not be fully accurate, and if anything sounds particularly inflammatory or makes some serious charge, you should check it out more thorougly before repeating it.

Perhaps wikipedia could seperate out articles that are more solid over time into a seperate site. These would not be directly editable but would be a bit more solid. I believe that the previous project the founder was doing (Nupedia?) was to be more like this. Anyway, I think the core of wikipedia is good, and I definetly wouldn't want to see contributions to it go down, but a way to seperate possibly biased or incorrect articles from those that have had more vetting would be good.
 
Old 12-10-2005, 07:45 PM   #4
XavierP
Moderator
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Kent, England
Distribution: Lubuntu
Posts: 19,176
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430Reputation: 430
2 comments: any journalist using Wikipedia as their sole source deserves to be sacked. They should be looking at 2 sources at a minimum. No excuses. And to the fella who was slandered, I suspect he had nothing for an article that week. Despite the fact that he was slandered (and there's no excuse for that), he could have simply edited out the offending portion of the article and submitted a more acceptable version. Then he could have gone to the moderation team and asked for the article to be locked.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Maria Winslow's LinuxWorld Blog: Open Source Java Application ... LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-09-2005 05:47 PM
LXer: Add LXer to new Gmail RSS feed LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-09-2005 05:45 PM
LXer: Add LXer to new Gmail RSS feed LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-09-2005 05:16 PM
LXer: Maria Winslow's LinuxWorld Blog: Open Source Java Application ... LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-09-2005 03:46 PM
LXer: Wikipedia's open-source label conundrum LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-09-2005 02:31 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration