Syndicated Linux NewsThis forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
First off, don't panic. We don't know for absolute sure that somewhere in the $2.2 billion acquisition of Novell by Attachmate and the “concurrent sale of certain intellectual property assets to CPTN Holdings LLC, a consortium of technology companies organized by Microsoft Corporation, for $450 million in cash” that those unidentified IP holding were, in fact, Novell's ownership of UNIX.
Meh, Novell has been sold out to M$ for a while, so I doubt anything will come of this. I mean M$ could have bought Novell 10000000 times over long ago, but they didn't.
The worst that could happen is M$ could sue and if they pay the judge and jury enough, Linux will be declared illegal in the US. I doubt it tho, because I don't think they can prove anything, and I don't know if they are willing to take the chance in bribing everyone, someone is gonna squeal.
Well remember Microsoft did try to claim that Linux was 'illegal' already through SCO, but since SCO never produced any 'evidence' that Linux infringed on their patents, SCO obviously lost, so Microsoft will try a different trick out of their hat, we just have to wait and see.
s this anything to be concerned about with Linux in general? I mean going by all that MS has done in the past (80's, 90's, etc.) Is this another attempt to grab a hold of open source, squeeze it dry and then pretend MS came up with it?
Wouldn't it bring down the internet in the United States, maybe world wide, if all the Linux servers would be declared illegal?
Not gonna happen without a big fight. Too many humongous companies like IBM, Oracle and Red Hat would get into the fray if Microsoft made any attempt to pull the plug on Linux. Microsoft isn't stupid, they're making much more money with much less effort by their Linux extortion scheme than they ever would by trying to force all Linux distros to pay.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.