LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > Linux - News > Syndicated Linux News
User Name
Password
Syndicated Linux News This forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-24-2006, 04:54 PM   #1
LXer
LXer NewsBot
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 75,165

Rep: Reputation: 87
LXer: Sugarcrm's Oram Discusses Secret Ingredients to Open Source


Published at LXer:

Clint Oram (pictured) will present a session on Secret Ingredients to Open Source Development at the Enterprise Open Source Conference and Expo June 5-6 in New York. Oram, who co-founder SugarCRM and is General Manager of Sugar Online, outlined his presentation in an exclusive SYS-CON interview.

Read More...
 
Old 04-24-2006, 08:20 PM   #2
Hangdog42
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,790
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 414Reputation: 414Reputation: 414Reputation: 414Reputation: 414
I find it kind of odd that Oram is talking about the use of open source since Sugar's commitement to OSS is actually pretty shaky. I've been using SugarCRM for several months now, and while it generally does a good job, I wouldn't call it true open source.

In this interview, Oram talks about how silly it is to pay outrageous license fees to software developers, yet for SugarCRM, the most advanced, and useful, features only exist in the paid version of the software. Furthermore, he touts the huge numbers of developers working on SugarCRM. While I don't dispute his numbers, my experience is that while Sugar may encourage developers, those working on the free version are actually discourage from contributing. Over the last few months, they were continually set back by a series of SugarCRM releases that broke their contributions. One of the most prolific developers seems to have given up in frustration. To add insult to injury, using some of the 3rd party upgrades to SugarCRM (which Sugar encouraged) actually prevented the SugarCRM upgrade from working.

As far as I can tell, few, if any, of the 3rd party contributions to SugarCRM actually get rolled into the free version of the product. Yes, it is perfectly legit to charge for an open source product, but Sugar seems to be actively preventing the enhancement of the free version while claiming to promote it.

And of course Sugar went after vTiger when vTiger had the temerity to actually fork the SugarCRM project.

All in all, I think they could have found a better example of OSS to highlight.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Open source and open medicine take centre stage at UN research symposium LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 04-13-2006 06:54 AM
LXer: Open Source Systems Solutions Teams With Open-Xchange To Deliver ... LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-26-2006 04:46 AM
LXer: OSBC San Francisco, Open Standards, and Open Source LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-18-2006 04:16 AM
LXer: Open Voting Through Open Source Opens Society Alex S. Gabor LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 02-12-2006 03:01 AM
LXer: Survey: Open source developers jump on bugs, open to closed tech LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-21-2005 01:46 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration