LXer: Microsoft cannot declare itself exempt from the requirements of GPLv3

		LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - News > Syndicated Linux News
LXer: Microsoft cannot declare itself exempt from the requirements of GPLv3

Syndicated Linux News This forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.

Notices

Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.

You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!

Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.

Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto | Site FAQ | Sitemap | Register Now

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.

Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.

Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.

Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.

Search this Thread

08-28-2007, 09:20 PM	#1
LXer LXer NewsBot Registered: Dec 2005 Posts: 128,338 Rep:	LXer: Microsoft cannot declare itself exempt from the requirements of GPLv3 Published at LXer: "Microsoft has engaged in anticompetitive conduct in the software industry for many years, and has sought to attack free software for almost as long," Free Software Foundation says. The Free Software Foundation (FSF) today released the following statement in response to claims by Microsoft regarding their obligations under the GNU General Public License version 3 (GPLv3): Microsoft cannot declare itself exempt from the requirements of GPLv3 Read More...

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
LXer: When Microsoft Met GPLv3	LXer	Syndicated Linux News	0	07-09-2007 08:01 PM
LXer: Microsoft Tries to Spit Out the GPLv3 Hook	LXer	Syndicated Linux News	0	07-06-2007 12:31 PM
LXer: Microsoft Says It Is Not Bound by GPLv3	LXer	Syndicated Linux News	2	07-06-2007 07:37 AM
LXer: GPLv3 on the Novell-Microsoft Patent Agreement	LXer	Syndicated Linux News	0	03-30-2007 06:31 AM
LXer: Kernel developers declare GPLv3 dangerous	LXer	Syndicated Linux News	0	09-23-2006 04:54 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:17 PM.

Main Menu

(Con't)

My LQ

Write for LQ

LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.

Main Menu

Syndicate

Latest Threads

LQ News

Twitter: @linuxquestions