Syndicated Linux NewsThis forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
With the recent news of several Linux vendors entering into partnership agreements with Microsoft (Novell, Linspire, Xandros), there has been much debate recently about two factions of Linux forming. Saying that Linux is going to be torn in two, makes for good press and lively debates, but this is certainly nothing new for Linux.
This piece is NOT gonna win Linspire any friends, and is probably going to generate more than a fair bit of outratge, particularly since it came from the CEO of Linspire.
It's not about anit-MS sentiment it's about contaminating free(libre) software with proprietry, closed source, software/drivers/codecs/etc. What they (Linspire) are doing is not wrong, as in against the law, but what they are doing is eroding the free software work that has been built up.
If we sell out to the proprietry world, the way Linspire is doing here, we will never get our complete free software solution (OS, apps, drivers, firmware, codecs, and the rest) because there will not be as much incentive for software companies and hardware makers to develop free solutions, they will just tell you to use a distro with proprietry blobs. We need to stick to our guns as a group of consumers and demand free solutions.
Linspire is not taking the moral high ground as Carmony says, otherwise they would refuse any and all non-free software in their distro.
Well even though it hurts that GNU is not recognized for the work they have done I'm glad he called it "Linux" as opposed to "GNU/Linux", at least he didn't tarnish the fine name of GNU.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.