LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > LinuxQuestions.org > Linux - News > Syndicated Linux News
User Name
Password
Syndicated Linux News This forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 01-15-2006, 07:01 PM   #1
LXer
LXer NewsBot
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Posts: 74,024

Rep: Reputation: 82
LXer: Firefox security (Really Windows Security or Lack Thereof - ED)


Published at LXer:

What would happen if Mozilla's Firefox suddenly became the browser that everyone was running? What would happen if it was as big a target for hackers and for virus and spyware authors as Internet Explorer is now. How would Firefox's reputation for security hold up? One has to wonder how secure a default Firefox installation is, and if there are things that can be done to make a Firefox deployment more secure? [ED: Oh, the horror - well this really is more about the lack of Windows IE security than the supposed object of interest. In physics scattering probability from a given nucleus is measure in terms of "barns" that if compared to the content here would be strictly proportional to the physical size and packing density, i.e. size of the program and how dense the number of targets in use on the internet. In nuclear physics and here too on a more mundane topic the interactions are much more complex than simple a priori probability. To be a worthwhile target in the case of a browser it must allow a pathway to either control or damage the target system, hence, even were the numbers reduced the integration of IE directly to the OS makes it still a more tempting target. Moreover, being more easily compromised just adds to it inherent attractiveness. So if you like to read why IE, Windows are not inherently at fault, this is a simple minded article for you - HC]

Read More...
 
Old 10-18-2008, 09:32 PM   #2
E3P
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0
I think that just Firefox not allowing activex, and not being integrated into the file system & explorer itself gives it a security advantage regardless of the size of its user base.

I think if the "Adblock Plus" and its "element hiding helper" extensions were built into the default installation, and it disallowed 3rd party cookies by default, it would be even more secure.

Either way I'm not worried, if Firefox follows IE's fate regardless of its advantages I will just switch to Opera, Safari, Epiphany, etc...

I always have 10 different browsers installed on the same system any ways, just so I can do things without cookies getting in my way...
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LXer: Linux vs. Windows security LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 01-03-2006 03:01 PM
LXer: Google's Firefox has plug-in security flaw LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-17-2005 04:01 AM
LXer: Microsoft warns of 'critical' Windows security flaw LXer Syndicated Linux News 2 12-13-2005 09:22 PM
LXer: Mozilla issues security advisory for Firefox 1.5 LXer Syndicated Linux News 0 12-13-2005 10:16 AM
Gnome toolbar, or lack thereof Fantus Linux - Newbie 6 08-28-2003 06:06 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 AM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration