Syndicated Linux NewsThis forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
Choice is an important element of free software, so it's perhaps no surprise that even at the level of the desktop environment there is more than one offering. But the main alternatives – KDE and GNOME – represent more than just a way of placing icons on a screen. Nowhere is that more evident than in their respective views on Microsoft's OOXML document standard, which are very far apart – perhaps dangerously so.
Is it? I would have thought that the choice is good - if you want OOXML you will probably go Gnome, otherwise you'll go KDE. Also, IIRC, corporate desktops tend to be Gnome based and they will be the ones who want this.
Microsoft's proposed "open document standard" is following the same path as other "embrace, extend, and extinguish" offerings it has made in the past. Although I do not know the whole story (of course), it is becoming increasingly clear that Microsoft is "buying" its way into Linux for its own purposes and GNOME, unfortunately, is the latest organization to succumb to their agenda.
I believe that Novell are pretty much a guiding force for Gnome, having de Icaza on the payroll certainly doesn't hurt. Microsoft have been threatening Linux for years and this may be the start of the push for some control.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.