Syndicated Linux NewsThis forum is for the discussion of Syndicated Linux News stories.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
In comments confirming the open-source community's suspicions, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer Thursday declared his belief that the Linux operating system infringes on Microsoft's intellectual property.
I wonder how much IP Microsoft infringes on? This is a can of worms they DON'T want to open. If it leads to a serious review of software patents in the US, Microsoft is going to be a big, big loser.
I guess spreading FUD is easier than getting your OS out on time.
I cannot tell for sure whether this is a bluff or not, but if it is not, I suspect that the alleged infringement is a very gray area, legally speaking. That is, if Microsoft had a clear case, I am sure they would have sued.
Maybe it's a media trick. It's been said, anyway, that their post-Vista release of Windows (if it ever comes out) will be very different from what people have been used to; i.e. getting the Start-button idea off board (which I consider a big change when talking about Windows). Maybe they're just selling an idea that Linux would have copied it's ideas from MS and that MS does a great job doing something fresh and new, whereas Linux just stays where it is. Sounds stupid but hey, that's the name of the game
EDIT: of course I don't think like that, but it's just something that has caught my eye. In my opinion Windows (and MS generally) owes a lot for a lot of other people, more than vice versa. It is true that others have loaned ideas from them, but on the contrary too.
If M$ ever succesfully sues anyone over patents, their success will be down to the incompetence of the legal team working for the defendant(s). Almost every product they've ever come out with is just a rehash of what someone else came up with first, there is "prior art" out the freakin wazoo. FUD FUD FUD! - that's all they have. I would love to see them try to sue anyone, except that I have little-to-no faith in the American legal system's ability to actually serve the interests of "the people", or justice even. The fact that they can just spread the FUD around so blantantly is scurrilously outrageous. Too bad "Free Software" can't sue for libel or something.
If they've got so many suit-worthy patents, where are the damn lawsuits??
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.