SUSE / openSUSEThis Forum is for the discussion of Suse Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
There seems to be many threads about hotplung and suse10.x, but my problem doesn't seem to be answered by other threads.
I have a USB/IDE thingamy and in my old suse 9.0 it was mountable as /dev/sda1 when hotplugged. Under suse 10.1 it isn't and I can't tell what it is.
tail -f /var/log/messages gives:
Jul 13 16:55:34 linux syslog-ng[5794]: SIGHUP received, restarting syslog-ng
Jul 13 16:55:36 linux syslog-ng[5794]: new configuration initialized
Jul 13 17:00:48 linux kernel: psmouse.c: Mouse at isa0060/serio3/input0 lost synchronization, throwing 2 bytes away.
Jul 13 17:00:48 linux kernel: klogd 1.4.1, ---------- state change ----------
Jul 13 17:02:35 linux kernel: usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 10
Jul 13 17:02:36 linux kernel: usb 1-1: new device found, idVendor=04ce, idProduct=0002
Jul 13 17:02:36 linux kernel: usb 1-1: new device strings: Mfr=1, Product=1, SerialNumber=0
Jul 13 17:02:36 linux kernel: usb 1-1: Product: ScanLogic USBIDE
Jul 13 17:02:36 linux kernel: usb 1-1: Manufacturer: ScanLogic USBIDE
Jul 13 17:02:36 linux kernel: usb 1-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
Ah, well. File structure didn't change. Should still have been sda1. If you cant get a desktop running with automount to see if it's good, have you tried it on another computer to see if the file system is corrupted?
Distribution: Suse 10.2, 10.3 Fedora Core 5 and Windows XP
Posts: 17
Rep:
USB storage Problems
The answer to Some of your problems are in an another
thread on the Forums look herehttp://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...d.php?t=390008. One of the things that helps with media is a feature
part of newest KDE. The latest version 3.5.3 has an automount function with application settings for each type of media. For example USB media can be opened with a player or just explored. KDE has other features that are shades of Windows that bring better operation for all linux desktops. So in closing update KDE from OpenSuSE repository and media problem should be solved along with you will have some advanced desktop features.
I use suse 10.1 and I don't have this problem. When I plug in my usb hard disk, after 10 seconds I can see the device icon in kde and mount it from there.
NO, NO, NO! My problem is not answered by that thread beacause I don't have an automount problem. Automounting is not even an issue because the device isn't even visible in /dev (as far as I can tell).
Is this problem Kernel/udev or a SuSE udev scripts/bootscripts problem?
When I plug in the device I get a new directory in /sys, namely /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb1/1-1 in which the are several directories, at least one of which has a modalias. If I knew the major and minor numbers of the device I could add a static node to lib/udev/devices, but I don't know how to find out those numbers.
When the device is plugged in, the usb-storage module is NOT automatically loaded. How can this be?
Can someone please help me, I don't want to go back to my obsolete suse9.0 and I don't want to ditch SuSE.
Last edited by ph73nt; 07-17-2006 at 09:53 AM.
Reason: Loads of typos
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.