SUSE / openSUSEThis Forum is for the discussion of Suse Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
This error message goes whizzing by everytime I boot Suse 10.0, and I finally decided to do some follow-up. So...
I searched the Suse forum and the message popped up a couple of times, but out of context. So I Googled around a bit and found this (lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/23/10):
>> - printk(KERN_ERR "swsusp: Suspend partition has wrong signature?\n");
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "swsusp: Suspend partition is no suspend image.\n");
>
> Hrm, I don't think it is a good message... What about "Suspend
> partition has no suspend image" or, better yet, "Suspend partition
> does not contain valid suspend image"?
the shorter, the better IMO but i do not really care to be honest.
It should just express that this usually is no error, so "wrong
signature" and maybe "not valid image" may scare the users. "has no
suspend image" sounds 'mostly harmless', so it may be best.
which sort of implies it isn't an error at all.
So... is it an error? Or is it just put there to keep us newbies on our toes ;-)
Any thoughts anyone?
Thanks,
Timothy.
P.S. My Dell D610 seems to suspend just fine, even though it throws up a whole slew of messages about various bit and pieces not being supported by ACPI.
this is not an error, it is only a warning, since suse is searching for suspend data in a image file. if you are not booting after you did suspend your pc or laptop it is clear that suse does not find any suspend data since there is no one.
Hi,
I've just added 512MB RAM to my SUSE 9.3 machine, and with it on boot up it stops at the line swsusp: Suspend partition has wrong signature and without is fine. Any ideas?
Cool, I'm going to implement it -- when I get new ram. The stick (on the advice of a collegue) failed Memtest so at least now we know why it didn't work. I understand that you type the command # make swap after you have inserted new ram -- is this what you're getting at?
Many thanks for taking the time to reply.
God Bless
Jonty
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.