SUSE / openSUSEThis Forum is for the discussion of Suse Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I prefer the old type of start menu style, it is easier to find the items you want.
whatever needs to be upgraded, i did it manually in 10.1, the firefox is 2.0, flash player is 9.0, other applications are not critical to have newer versions.
So,10.1 is just perfect for me!
Last edited by unSpawn; 01-16-2011 at 12:13 PM.
Reason: //Deflate post count
I reckon 10.0 was the best suse ever.
A lot of poeple (like me) just upgrade for the sake of having the latest stuff. If 10.1 is perfect for you then you do right sticking with it.
I reckon 10.0 was the best suse ever.
A lot of poeple (like me) just upgrade for the sake of having the latest stuff. If 10.1 is perfect for you then you do right sticking with it.
i have the DVD for 10.0,10.1,9.3, all had been tried, 10.2 is crap, 10.3 alpha 1 is fine.
currently i am running 10.1 from my notebook, not intend to upgrade yet.
i download tarballs of firefox etc.. to install in separate folder to have the latest version of firefox, got all plugins and addons, everything is fine!
10.1 was frustrating because of the broken installation/update stuff: YAST update was totally crap and the newly introduced ZEN updater was not suitable for a stable release! In 10.2 the YAST update has been fixed.
Personally, I like the new start menu. Anyway, to have chance to switch back to the old KDE style menu is fine. The ZEN updater is quite unuseful in my opinion (but it can be uninstalled): I think it is an attempt to emulate Windows Update, maybe to make new linux users feel like they can do things the same way!
I have not tried 10.3 alpha 1, yet. However, after your positive opinion I am really curious: which are the improvements you noticed, TigerLinux?
It's easy to break things. I have 10.0
I removed the hostname in the network settings part because I was following some instructions on the web, and then boot up and shut become very slow.
apache stopped working or something. I tried to uninstall and reinstall. Tried to delete the folders. Doesn't work anymore.
Reinstall is not able to repair it.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.