SUSE / openSUSEThis Forum is for the discussion of Suse Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
You need to have the compiler and dependencies installed. It can be easy or difficult, depending of your skills and program that you want to compile. Firefox can be tough... start with something like aterm . Here is a link that tells you how to install from source:
1 - Uncompress the file
2 - run "./configure"
3 - run "make && make install"
This, however, is not always true. Some applications simply create an executable by running make, others, as mplayer, needs extra parameters to compile with gui support, etc. Read the docs/README file of every applications you are willing to compile FIRST. If you can find a package for your distro, don't botter compiling either, unless, of course, you want to learn how to do it.
I've noticed also that a few applications (again, mplayer) gives a better performance when compiled from source then the binaries. Most of the others applications, however, are not as noticeable.
Regards!
Last edited by Mega Man X; 05-13-2005 at 05:36 PM.
I save the files to the tar.gz file to the home directory, extract it, then open terminal from the extracted folder. Then I type "./configure" and then afterwards "make". Then I type in "su", type in the root password, and type in "make install". Is that right?
"F-Prot Antivirus tarballs now come with an installation script called install-f-prot.pl. It can be found in the directory created when extracting the tarballs. If you choose to use this script, you can skip the next step titled "Installing manually." To run the script, change to the f-prot/ directory and execute it:
tar xvfz /path/to/fp-linux-ws-VERSION.tar.gz
cd f-prot/
./install-f-prot.pl
Follow the instructions printed to the screen."
I'm sorry, but I don't understand what it's asking me to do with the commands in bold. Could you clarify for me?
Also, can I use the default way to install most other program from source?
First you will download the file you want. Let's say it's called "fp-linux-ws-VERSION.tar.gz". Then, go to the folder where you've downloaded that file using a terminal.
When you are at the same folder, type:
tar xvzf fp-linux-ws-VERSION.tar.gz
That will uncompress your file into a folder called "f-prot/". Go inside that folder, then type:
./install-f-prot.pl
That should run the installer for it. I've two advices though:
1 - Since you are using SuSE, a rpm based distro, it's just easier to use the .rpm instead.
2 - It's Linux, you not really need an anti-virus, ever. Just never be fooling around as root user .
Originally posted by Maligogo90 Also, can I use the default way to install most other program from source?
That really, really depends. Usually, the "default" way works, but there are cases where it does not. This anti-virus is an example of the ones that doesn't. It will always be described on the Readme file how to compile, however. If there's no readme file, then the program is not worth installing. Any good programmer out there should make a Readme first thing
Thanks so much for your input. I'll just use an RPM to install Firefox 1.0.4. for SuSE 9.3 instead of doing all that complicated stuff, but at least I know how it's done
Oh, should I uninstall the previous version from YaST and then install the 1.0.4. version?
You're most welcome!. I would recommend uninstalling it first. If it was a heavly dependent library, I always upgrade. Packages as Firefox, I simply install a new one . Oh, I've one more advice: there's a way to configure YaST so every package will be downloaded from the net, ratter then switching CD's/DVD. If well configured, it'll be your Ultimate friend . Read this:
Yup, and if you find some good repositories, you can easily add them in order to use packages not provided by SuSE, as mplayer, for example. You can always google for repositories. Packman is a great one. I'm not sure if this is the link:
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.