LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Suse/Novell
User Name
Password
Suse/Novell This Forum is for the discussion of Suse Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 11-05-2005, 10:15 AM   #1
masonm
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Following the white rabbit
Distribution: Slackware64 13.37 Android 4.0
Posts: 2,248

Rep: Reputation: 46
Impressions of SuSE 10.0


I have to admit that I have never been a big fan of SuSE, but so far I think Novell has made some real improvements with 10.0.

As a long time Slackware user, I'm not a fan of automated configuration tools but so far it seems SuSE has finally gotten them working well enough that they don't seem to create more problems than they solve.

I downloaded, burned, and installed the 64 bit evaluation version DVD of 10.0 pretty much expecting the same sort of thing I've seen from SuSE in past releases. I was pleasantly surprised to find that all of my hardware was detected and configured correctly without much input from me during the installation process.

I checked out the system config files after the installation and amazingly enough everything was configured correctly which is something SuSE had never been able to pull off in the past.

After some initial confusion on my part with how Novell had set up the repositories for the 64 bit version, I set up the repositories list in YAST and proceeded to do some updates and application installations. Imagine my surprise when YAST actually performed it's dependency checking correctly! In the past this had been a real sore spot with me and YAST as it invariably claimed dependency problems/missing dependencies when none actually existed.

The x86_64 version runs reasonably quickly (almost as quickly as the 32 bit version of Slack) and so far I am fairly impressed with it. SuSE had, in the past, loaded up a lot of services that I realy didn't want, and expected the same this time. Turned out there were only a couple of services I had to shut down.

I think Novell is heading in the right direction with SuSE 10.0, and I can easily see it becoming a very popular desktop distribution.

In some ways, it has a little too much of a "Windows" feel with the YOU updates and SuSEwatcher, but that's not a completely bad thing, especialy for someone migrating from Windows to Linux.

All in all I would have to say that my impressions of SuSE 10.0, at least the x86_64 version, are very favorableand I would recommend it to a a person looking to migrate to Linux.
 
Old 11-05-2005, 10:21 AM   #2
Mega Man X
Guru
 
Registered: Apr 2003
Location: ~
Distribution: Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Solaris, DSL
Posts: 5,339

Rep: Reputation: 63
You could maybe make a review?
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First impressions on FC3 anyone? Strixy Fedora 40 09-15-2005 02:03 AM
suse 9.1 initial impressions ronss Linux - Distributions 4 05-21-2004 04:28 AM
Lindows 4.5 first impressions bb_matt Linux - Distributions 3 02-04-2004 01:23 PM
9.2 beta impressions manpage Mandriva 2 08-29-2003 01:41 PM
Libranet 2.7 impressions bax Linux - Distributions 0 09-20-2002 12:05 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:39 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration