LinuxQuestions.org
Download your favorite Linux distribution at LQ ISO.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Suse/Novell
User Name
Password
Suse/Novell This Forum is for the discussion of Suse Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
LinkBack Search this Thread
Old 07-13-2005, 09:54 AM   #1
gtkmike
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Distribution: RedHat
Posts: 11

Rep: Reputation: 0
9.3 Version Question


Hello Forum,

I just downloaded Suse 9.3 (i386 version). When I did the installation, I got a window popped up telling me...

cool computer....but you are about to install 32 bit software on a 64 bit machine. Do you want to continue?

Now I continued and the install went well.

However, I want this to be right. So, should I get the x86_64 version?

I have a Dell Dimension 8400, and I can find nothing that tells me this is a 64 bit system....that doesn't mean it is not of course. The SUSE installation software is telling me it is.

So should I get the x86_64 version (or is there something else to get)?


thanks for any and all assistance,
Mike
 
Old 07-13-2005, 11:05 AM   #2
Motown
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Muncie, IN
Distribution: Whatever's handy
Posts: 104

Rep: Reputation: 15
From what I understand, the 64bit version is pretty stable now, but you'll lack in a few proprietary softwares that come pre-compiled; flash-player, for instance. (no big loss, it's just used for ads anyways)

Beyond that, I have yet to come across anyone who has said, "Yes, using the 64bit version has improved performance" to *any* degree. If it's just for desktop use, you are probably better off saving yourself the hassles.

ps. if your processor is an intel 6xx series, it's 64 bit. I looked in your system documentation, and it didn't specifiy, but your motherboard likely supports it.

Last edited by Motown; 07-13-2005 at 11:09 AM.
 
Old 07-13-2005, 11:21 AM   #3
KimVette
Senior Member
 
Registered: Dec 2004
Location: Bawstun area
Distribution: Suse (10.2, 10.3), CentOS, and Ubuntu
Posts: 1,794

Rep: Reputation: 46
Quote:
Originally posted by Motown
flash-player, for instance. (no big loss, it's just used for ads anyways)
Other uses for flash:
- OddTodd
- strongbad
- homestar runner
- streaming audio (see: Pink Floyd web site, Aerosmith web site)
- entire web sites (see: the EMI-hosted Pink Floyd web site, the Aerosmith web site, a zillion other web sites)
- simple games
- navbars

Annoying popup ads are NOT the only use for flash. You could be missing out on a lot.
 
Old 07-13-2005, 11:28 AM   #4
Motown
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Muncie, IN
Distribution: Whatever's handy
Posts: 104

Rep: Reputation: 15
Okay, I stand corrected and should rephrase: most flash apps don't concern me

I have it installed anyways.
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Regarding distribution + kernel version + gcc version + glib version. JCipriani Linux - General 8 04-19-2008 02:54 PM
KDE version question vbmark Mandriva 2 11-24-2004 08:33 AM
A question about Autoconf version 2.52... Ausar Linux - Newbie 2 08-10-2004 03:44 PM
FreeBSD Version Question. rvijay *BSD 4 09-25-2003 07:52 PM
version question and how to Robin01 Linux - Software 4 09-11-2003 08:55 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 AM.

Main Menu
 
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration