Slackware - InstallationThis forum is for the discussion of installation issues with Slackware.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
What would be the best partition setup I should use on my 4GB -- yes, only 4GB -- drive? I'm not having much on there, basically just the tools which are required; a single window manager (xFce), OpenOffice.org, Mozilla (Firefox & Thunderbird), and some simple, oft-used tools.
I'd just chop the drive in half, less whatever swap I needed. As far as that, I run an X-less ZipSlack9.0 with 32 megs RAM and a 32 meg swap file and it works fine. (Great for compiling 'Hello world' and 'Violate my RAM and wipe my harddrive'.) I run a Slack9.1 with 512 megs RAM and 512 meg swap and never touch swap - rarely go over 250-300 RAM with everything cached and all. It all depends on usage. And I've got several partitions on this box but none on the P100. On a box that size, I wouldn't mess with too fine a partitioning scheme, either.
One theory: Install the system with 3 gigs / and 1 gig swap, install what you want, run everything you might normally run at once, plus compile something major on top of it. Pay attention to disk space and memory usage. Wipe it and reinstall accordingly. Probably end up deciding you need 256 swap or less and that / will fit decently in 2 gigs or less.
As far as where to put swap, this should help: Swap Placement.
The stuff elsewhere in that should help with the rest.
Well, yeah, in theory. I mean, like I say, if you do heavy video editing and only have 32 megs physical RAM things are going to suck. If you only want to run vi and gcc, 256 is probably too much. Similarly, if my partitions were all one, excluding /home, / would fit in about 1.8 gigs - if you consciously tried to slim down, you could use much less. If you piled in KDE and Gnome and so on, you could use much more. So there aren't any hard numbers - those just sound reasonable.
Kewl. I was just wondering for this specific install. Its an "old" machine (166MHz, 4GB HDD, 32Mb Ram... 128Mb ram in there somewhere too i think...).
Basically I'm looking at:
xFce for the window manager (no KDE or Gnome - they're just too heavy).
OpenOffice.org, cos its usefull
Mozilla Firefox and Thunderbird, for web and email.
PDF Viewer, calc, etc. You know, the odds and ends that you just need.
I really don't want any more on the box than is needed. Its going to a family member, and if there's something on there that they don't know about I'll be spending *weeks* going through it with them. Moving them from Mozilla Mail to Thunderbird is going to be a task in itself! I know it was when I moved them from Outlook!
I'm confused - the 32 or 128 makes a big difference. Swap won't help much, though. I don't run OOo so I can't say from definite experience, but that won't run unless it is 128 (at least) and then you probably do want at least 256 swap. Also, I imagine OOo takes up a chunk of disk space. Stuff like Firefox would be sluggish but it should be doable. I think. You're right that mozilla would never work, unfortunately. The rest should be fine. If it's really 32, I'd see about getting some more physical RAM.
I've got some in the box, but its not showing up at boot during the mem check. However, its got a seperate 32Mb ram slot (which is occupied) and then a further 4 slots, one of which has 128 in it. Its confuzzling the hell out of me.
Hm. 5 slots? Weird. If it's not showing under some other OS, maybe it'll be different under Linux. If free/top/whatever don't show it while running, might try passing 'mem=160M' to LILO to declare how much you should have. I think it's usually to get the kernel to recognize huge amounts of RAM, but can apply in other cases. Or you might try yanking the 32 and seeing what happens - sometimes mismatched sticks will screw each other up. Just guessing here. Good luck!