Slackware - InstallationThis forum is for the discussion of installation issues with Slackware.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
hi
i TOO have the L 01 01 01... problem. in most other threads, everyone is asked to paste their lilo.conf file. so here it is (clipped):
# Start LILO global section
boot = /dev/hda
#compact # faster, but won't work on all systems.
delay = 300
# VESA framebuffer console @ 800x600x64k
vga = 788
# End LILO global section
# DOS bootable partition config begins
other = /dev/hda1
label = windows
table = /dev/hda
# DOS bootable partition config ends
# Linux bootable partition config begins
image = /boot/vmlinuz
root = /dev/hdd6
label = linux
read-only # Non-UMSDOS filesystems should be mounted read-only for checking
# Linux bootable partition config ends
hda is a 20 GB. hdd is an 80 GB disk. hdd1 is a 32 GB vfat, hhd2 is 37 GB NTFS. the rest are linux and one linux swap. hdd6 has the required linux install.
would this be the same 1024+ cylinders issue? i thought the bios that comes with a via kt 133 motherboard would be recent enough to handle that.
btw, does the addressing mode have to be set to LBA in bios? neccessarily? for both disks?
Looks like LILO is already in the MBR, since boot=/dev/hda.
According to the lilo man page, 01 means "invalid disk command" (really helpful eh?) The only line of your lilo.conf that looks odd to me is the table=/dev/hda part; I've never needed it, so you may be able to remove it. It might be causing the error (I'm not sure where Windows keeps its partition table, though /dev/hda sounds like a likely candidate).
I've no clue what effect LBA has. I have two machines with 80GB drives and I've never had to make any adjustments to the BIOS or anything, but then again maybe I just have good BIOS
Originally posted by wapcaplet The only line of your lilo.conf that looks odd to me is the table=/dev/hda part; I've never needed it, so you may be able to remove it. It might be causing the error (I'm not sure where Windows keeps its partition table, though /dev/hda sounds like a likely candidate).
yes, it is already in the MBR. also, that's the file that the slackware setup generated when i choose expert mode since there were 2 different OSes to load (soon 3). i'll try it after removing the table line. just for info, i used to boot linux normally using the setup cd and typing something like:
boot: linux root=/dev/hdd6 (that's what i did this time) so does that confirm that the bios can handle large disks without any issues?
btw, when i do something like: # lilo -u -s /boot/boot.0300
it uninstalls lilo and restores my orginal mbr. (did this to recover from above error). so now, does boot.0300 still contain my original MBR data or does it have the lilo stuff. i.e. is it a swap or just a restore? (anyways, backed it up before this step)
i don't remember seeing the error messages thing in the lilo man page, maybe i'll go look again (at online man pages) :P
does the setting/entry need to be different if it's winxp?
Originally posted by wapcaplet The only line of your lilo.conf that looks odd to me is the table=/dev/hda part; I've never needed it, so you may be able to remove it.
i've noticed that alot of ppl who've posted their lilo.conf's HAVE the table= line. any other ideas? are there any diffs for a winxp partition?
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.