SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
On a slackware64 14.1 desktop top shows that X constantly uses 20%+ of the cpu even when the computer is mostly idle. I have seen that this problem has been linked in the past to the nouveau driver or to Terminal, but I am using the proprietary NVIDIA driver and the same behavior is exhibited in eg. xterm, konsole, etc.
Does anyone have any other ideas of what to do about this.
PS. inactive libreoffice also seems to constantly use nearly 10% of the CPU, but I can close libreoffice, I can't really close X
It seems that firefox was the culprit. So in addition to high cpu usage for the firefox process itself and the dreaded plugin-container processes, but it also drives high usage for the X process? Looks like time to look into alternatives. Is chrome better for that?
What I found was that the )&*(& advertisements are all video/flash based, and the flash player filled the X server with activity... Even when the windows are unmapped, the X server is still given the data... which has to be discarded as the window is unmapped.
And it didn't matter what browser is in use. I use firefox... my wife prefers chrome, yet when her login display is unmapped, chrome is still busy passing data to the flash player, then to the X server...
The I think the flash player just ignores proper X handling (it should know it is unmapped, and then to not bother the X server until it gets a mapped event).