Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to
LinuxQuestions.org , a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free.
Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please
contact us . If you need to reset your password,
click here .
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
07-06-2009, 11:48 PM
#16
HCL Maintainer
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Tupelo, MS
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 6,926
Rep:
The Slackware server in China is, suspiciously, up. And ...
Code:
mingdao@jeremiah:~$ cat /etc/slackware-version
Slackware x86_64
Last edited by Bruce Hill; 07-06-2009 at 11:49 PM .
Reason: upgraded
07-07-2009, 08:57 AM
#17
Senior Member
Registered: May 2004
Distribution: Slackware 13.0 32-bit
Posts: 1,951
Rep:
I guess the main server has suffered some kind of fatal hardware failure. Time for a server change then.
07-08-2009, 06:12 AM
#18
Member
Registered: Oct 2008
Location: Poland, Łódź
Distribution: Sabayon, Saline and Salix
Posts: 98
Rep:
Hi,
I guess, the reliability of Slackware suffers from this several days lasting webserver failure
07-08-2009, 06:26 AM
#19
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Jogja, Indonesia
Distribution: Slackware-Current
Posts: 1,376
Rep:
if it comes to hardware problem, then i think it's not fair to judge the reliability of the system
07-08-2009, 06:28 AM
#20
Slackware Contributor
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: New Zealand
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 961
Quote:
Originally Posted by
witek
Hi,
I guess, the reliability of Slackware suffers from this several days lasting webserver failure
No the mirrors are all still fine, people are testing the RC and It's just the webserver.
It is being worked on and I'll post in this thread when it's back online.
P.S yes it is a hardware issue.
07-08-2009, 07:05 AM
#21
HCL Maintainer
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Tupelo, MS
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 6,926
Rep:
And if you need any official source or packages, ftp.slackware.com is not down.
07-08-2009, 07:05 AM
#22
LQ Addict
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,371
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bruce Hill
And if you need any official source or packages, ftp.slackware.com is not down.
Or if you need to check the changelog
.
07-08-2009, 09:39 AM
#23
Moderator
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: Slackware®
Posts: 9,367
Hi,
Quote:
Originally Posted by
witek
Hi,
I guess, the reliability of Slackware suffers from this several days lasting webserver failure
Everyone experiences hardware issues. You can have redundancy but at what cost? The reliability of Slackware has nothing to do with the home site 'slackware.com' being down due to hardware problems. There are mirrors for everything so don't get your pants bunched up.
'
AlphaGeek's Unofficial Mirror List ' is a place to start.
The above link and others are available from '
Slackware-Links '. More than just Slackware® links!
07-08-2009, 09:48 AM
#24
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Laptop: Slackware 13.37 // Desktop: Slackware64 13.37 // Netbook: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 5,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by
onebuck
so don't get your pants bunched up.
Or as we say over here: "Don't get your knickers in a twist".
07-08-2009, 09:59 AM
#25
Moderator
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: Slackware®
Posts: 9,367
Hi,
Quote:
Originally Posted by
brianL
Or as we say over here: "Don't get your knickers in a twist".
If I had really said what I thought then the mods would have jumped me. But you got my meaning.
07-08-2009, 10:06 AM
#26
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by
onebuck
Hi,
If I had really said what I thought then the mods would have jumped me. But you got my meaning.
Ha-ha, yes, true enough, onebuck.
Don't sweat it, people. This is nothing to be concerned about.
07-08-2009, 12:04 PM
#27
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,108
Rep:
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mRgOBLIN
No the mirrors are all still fine, people are testing the RC and It's just the webserver.
It is being worked on and I'll post in this thread when it's back online.
P.S yes it is a hardware issue.
Is this the same PIII 600 that has ran the site for
years ?
07-08-2009, 01:37 PM
#28
Member
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: Colorado
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 395
Rep:
All better now...
It's back!
07-08-2009, 02:04 PM
#29
Moderator
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: Slackware®
Posts: 9,367
Hi,
Cool!
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:05 PM .
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know .
Latest Threads
LQ News