SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I guess it depends on how comfortable you are with the kernel build process and resolving any issues an update may introduce.
Following the 3.2.x branch might be safer which is what I'm doing. Currently on 3.2.34.
@Ser Olmy,
Did you use the 'huge' or 'generic' config as template?
I have tried 3.6.8 with the huge config and trying to go easy on myself ...
Code:
yes "" | make oldconfig
I found that DLM gave me errors (CONFIG_GFS2_FS_LOCKING_DLM=y) so had to change it to 'n'.
It then compiled with no (serious) errors, but I can't run it - alas - the infamous "failed to mount filesystem on ..."
I tried a good oldfashioned 'make oldconfig' but was asked wayyy too many questions for my simple mind.
If your config-3.6.7 is 32-bits, would you mind terribly posting it somewhere?
Thanks in advance.
I tried a good oldfashioned 'make oldconfig' but was asked wayyy too many questions for my simple mind.
If your config-3.6.7 is 32-bits, would you mind terribly posting it somewhere?
Thanks in advance.
I'm afraid I'm running x86_64.
I used the "huge" kernel as a template (downloaded the new kernel, zcat'ed /proc/config.gz to .config, ran make oldconfig and then make menuconfig to change the setting for all non-critical drivers to be compiled as modules).
I've thought about creating a poll about the habits of most slackers.. Do people sit on the stock kernel released with Slack? Or is it a good idea to update the kernel in the same branch (3.2.29 -> 3.2.34)? Jump to the latest release (3.6.8)?
I've thought about creating a poll about the habits of most slackers.. Do people sit on the stock kernel released with Slack? Or is it a good idea to update the kernel in the same branch (3.2.29 -> 3.2.34)? Jump to the latest release (3.6.8)?
I am using 3.6.7, I was getting some battery drain on my Thinkpad T520 with the stock.
so usually upgrading the kernel is a good idea on most linux distros?
Depends on your distro. In Slackware it is much easier and straightforward. Other distro have the kernels so heavily patched it's like playing Twister with a greased pig.
@derfzz
I wouldn't think so. On Slackware it should be ok because of lack of patches.
If you look at eg. Redhat - they have 1000+ patches to their kernel - I wouldn't change that for love nor money! (which I guess is the whole purpose of having an 'enterprise' distro ...)
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.