SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I just feel that Slackware pays less attention to the most popular boot loader on linux grub beside lilo.
It depends on what you consider "popular" to mean.
If you call something which is widespread and heavily used as a default "popular", yes, it is popular.
If you call something which is loved and respected by many "popular", then I am afraid Grub2 is not popular.
Not long ago, I witnessed a discussion in a Spanish Debian forum about Grub2. It was regarded as a Minion of the Dark Forces by 90% of the users in the thread, and the other 10% thought of it as the Master of the Dark Forces himself. There is people that likes Grub2, but I would say most people don't. Grub 2 configuration process is clumsy and, by the way, not that good documented. The "advantages" of grub2 over grub-legacy, while they exist, are not generally interesting for 95% of users, who will only see the disadvantages of the new configuration system. I'd chose syslinux, Lilo or Grub-legacy any day unless I needed a particular Gurb2 feature (may the Lord protect me that day!).
Better adding support for the syslinux bootloaders to the installer IMO.
I'd support this. extlinux is fantastic - install the bootloader, then edit syslinux.conf with your favourite text editor to add a new kernel to the menu. No external commands to run, no fuss. This is how bootloading ought to be.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.