LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 10-15-2004, 11:59 AM   #1
philipacamaniac
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Distribution: Slackware 10, Slackware-current, Slax
Posts: 50

Rep: Reputation: 15
Question Why won't Pat include Firefox?


Honestly, folks. I hope he has a legit "security/stability" reason for not including Firefox at *least* in the /testing directory.

Mozilla.org doesn't even really advertise for their Mozilla Suite anymore; Firefox is what they use, Firefox is what I use, Firefox is what YOU use. I'm sure Pat uses Firefox, too.

Debian, Mandrake, and Fedora have all included Firefox since version 0.9.3, and I'm pretty sure any security holes in Firefox can be found the base Mozilla Suite code.

Opinions, please!
 
Old 10-15-2004, 12:03 PM   #2
sh1ft
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Can
Distribution: Slackware, ubuntu
Posts: 391

Rep: Reputation: 31
I agree 100%, I think firefox should be included in slackware, and it probably will be ones the official 1.0 release comes out. Until then its still officially pre-release, so that has to be the reason for its exclusion. Although the bugs found in firefox are usually found in mozilla as well, and right now firefox seems pretty polished.

Remember that when slack 10 was released firefox was around 0.8 I believe, and was lacking many features it now has. I would expect it to be included in 10.1 definitely.
 
Old 10-15-2004, 12:31 PM   #3
win32sux
Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371
i quote from the slackware current changelog (september 19):

Quote:
xap/mozilla-1.7.3-i486-1.tgz: Upgraded to mozilla-1.7.3.
The Mozilla page says this fixes some "minor security holes".
It also breaks Galeon and Epiphany, and new versions of these have
still not appeared. In light of this, I think it's time to remove
these Gecko-based browsers. The future is going to be Firefox and
Thunderbird anyway, and I don't believe Galeon and Epiphany can be
compiled against Firefox's libraries.
i'm sure firefox will be included in slackware as soon as it becomes stable...
 
Old 10-15-2004, 12:42 PM   #4
philipacamaniac
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Distribution: Slackware 10, Slackware-current, Slax
Posts: 50

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Well, I guess that makes sense. Now that I see that changelog, I think I remember reading that. I'm still waiting for Zack Rusin over at KDE to make a KFirefox. Especially if Pat does decide to remove Gnome (which I don't really think he will).
 
Old 10-15-2004, 12:55 PM   #5
win32sux
Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371
yeah i heard something about gnome getting a pink slip from patrick...

what's that about??
 
Old 10-15-2004, 01:30 PM   #6
Hangdog42
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 7,791
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 414Reputation: 414Reputation: 414Reputation: 414Reputation: 414
Quote:
yeah i heard something about gnome getting a pink slip from patrick...

what's that about??
There is a huge thread around here somewhere about this, but basically Patrick says that maintaining Gnome takes up about a third of the entire Slackware development effort and he is tired of spending that level of time on one aspect of Slackware.
 
Old 10-15-2004, 01:54 PM   #7
sh1ft
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Can
Distribution: Slackware, ubuntu
Posts: 391

Rep: Reputation: 31
Quote:
Originally posted by philipacamaniac
I'm still waiting for Zack Rusin over at KDE to make a KFirefox. Especially if Pat does decide to remove Gnome (which I don't really think he will). [/B]
Have you tried the platikfox theme? It makes firefox seem completely integrated with kde.
 
Old 10-15-2004, 02:45 PM   #8
win32sux
Guru
 
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Distribution: Ubuntu
Posts: 9,870

Rep: Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371Reputation: 371
Quote:
Originally posted by Hangdog42
There is a huge thread around here somewhere about this, but basically Patrick says that maintaining Gnome takes up about a third of the entire Slackware development effort and he is tired of spending that level of time on one aspect of Slackware.
here's the thread if anybody wants to stop-by:

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...hreadid=240451
 
Old 10-15-2004, 03:24 PM   #9
nick_th_fury
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Distribution: Slackware, NetBSD
Posts: 151

Rep: Reputation: 23
I disagree. I only use firefox, which is why I do not want it included.
Some programs link to mozilla, so I can see it's inclusion.

I hate installers on small apps. It's soo much easier to download, untar, run.
Simple, & easy. Why do we need an installed version to muck it up?
 
Old 10-15-2004, 03:57 PM   #10
sh1ft
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Can
Distribution: Slackware, ubuntu
Posts: 391

Rep: Reputation: 31
Err.. are programs dependant on joe for example? Does that mean it should not be included? No, because it serves a purpose, it is a good lightweight editor, just like firefox is a good lightweight browser. Of course it should be included, that's the whole point of distros, to include useful apps that everyone uses.
 
Old 10-16-2004, 06:45 AM   #11
nick_th_fury
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Distribution: Slackware, NetBSD
Posts: 151

Rep: Reputation: 23
Not really. There are tons of apps that slack doesn't include.
It gives us a nice stable base. Firefox changes all the time.
Why even bother? We would just be upgrading it immediately anyway.

I think things are perfect the way they are for now.
After the mozilla team does what they said, & Firefox replaces mozilla.
Then would be a good time to have it included.
For now, it's easier to keep it the way it is, IMO.
 
Old 10-16-2004, 09:05 AM   #12
the who
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: FRG, EU
Distribution: Slackware current
Posts: 51

Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by nick_th_fury
After the mozilla team does what they said, & Firefox replaces mozilla.
There are no plans to abandon the Suite. But there's quite a few Linux-specific bugs with Firefox when installed in a system (non-home) location, maybe Pat waits until these are fixed.
 
Old 10-16-2004, 09:27 AM   #13
Franklin
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Distribution: Slackware, WinXP, Windows 7
Posts: 1,253

Rep: Reputation: 55
I understand the need for this as much as I understand the need for slackware packages of OO.o. Why should PV (or anyone else for that matter) waste time creating packages for software that installs beutifully with the provided install scipts?

 
Old 10-16-2004, 04:04 PM   #14
nick_th_fury
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Distribution: Slackware, NetBSD
Posts: 151

Rep: Reputation: 23
Quote:
Originally posted by the who
There are no plans to abandon the Suite. But there's quite a few Linux-specific bugs with Firefox when installed in a system (non-home) location, maybe Pat waits until these are fixed.
I thought I had read that they would eventually merge. Perhaps I'm wrong.
I do agree with the bugs, as it still has quite a few that will kill it.


Quote:
I understand the need for this as much as I understand the need for slackware packages of OO.o. Why should PV (or anyone else for that matter) waste time creating packages for software that installs beutifully with the provided install scipts?
I totally agree. I'd rather install these programs myself.
That way I set them up exactly as I choose.
Not a big deal really, I just would not install them from CD.
I'd install slack without, them do them manually.
 
Old 10-16-2004, 06:21 PM   #15
philipacamaniac
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Distribution: Slackware 10, Slackware-current, Slax
Posts: 50

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
Quote:
Originally posted by Franklin
I understand the need for this as much as I understand the need for slackware packages of OO.o. Why should PV (or anyone else for that matter) waste time creating packages for software that installs beutifully with the provided install scipts?

Then why even include any browser? There's an easy installer for Mozilla Suite, too. As well as Epiphany, Galeon, and others. I only brought it up because Firefox is clearly the leader in the Alternative Browser MarketTM. Not including OOo makes sense because its a huge package and not necessarily the best thing out there. Not in including Firefox is just plain silliness, because anyone installing Slack on a desktop will just have to go download and install it anyway.

Like it or not, Pat's already said that he's moving towards Firefox.


<sarcasm>You know, I use lynx a lot, so I wish it wasn't included in my favorite operating system.</sarcasm>
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can Pat Keep it Up? shepper Slackware 16 12-21-2005 12:49 AM
10.2, second cd is not bootable rescue, hai from pat rkrishna Slackware 11 09-09-2005 09:01 AM
Need a distro that has SATA down pat corbintechboy Linux - Distributions 7 06-25-2005 08:38 PM
Pat drops Java SDK acanton Slackware 57 02-14-2005 08:37 AM
Pat needs our Help! Namaseit Slackware 15 01-31-2005 01:55 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration