Why is /sbin/initscript.sample not /etc/initscript.sample ?
 

initscript.sample is provided by the sysvinti package.

The script's comment suggests that it should be placed in /etc/ :

However, the package SlackBuild does it differently:

https://mirrors.slackware.com/slackw...nit.SlackBuild

Why? What's the rationale? I seldom (read 'never') saw /etc and /sbin being on different partitions.

Slackware's init is a BSD-style init, meaning that it is a series of scripts.

The SysVinit package provides compatibility with SysV. I suspect that the modifications to the SysVinit package have been made so that SysVinit can provide that compatibility without intruding.

I know. I'm playing with the Slackware's sysv emulation at the moment, because I had some trouble making VMware run.
For me it doesn't make much sense to ship a script prototype in /sbin/. Probably either ship it in the default location, or just throw it away completely, as with other unused parts of the sysv.

init does look for it under /etc/
OP. is correct, there's definitely an inconsistency here. Whether the sample should be moved to /etc, or sysvinit patched to look for it in /sbin/ I guess is a matter of preference.

Maybe just putting it in /usr/doc/sysvinit* (it is a sample after all) and leaving those who want to install it to do so manually is the right approach.

This is a confidential information, not accessible for your access level. ;)