LinuxQuestions.org
Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 05-23-2010, 04:34 PM   #76
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh000 View Post
Well, I think bare.i was a concept more than being specific to a kernel version branch.

Older versions of slackware also had a huge.s, did they not?

bare.i was just a barebones kernel for booting on older/limited hardware, and there is now no equivalent, correct?
Yeah, that's true. However, I challenge you to make a bare.i 2.6.x kernel, it's not on there now, but you can add one.
 
Old 05-23-2010, 04:41 PM   #77
damgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 201Reputation: 201Reputation: 201
I guess there was a huge change from 2.4 to 2.6 so that simply taking the .config file from bare.i and using it to try and build a 2.6.x kernel would be essentially impossible? It seems that generic might be able to be stripped further. bare.i is approximately half the size of generic-2.6.33.4 which is the smallest of the -current kernels.
 
Old 05-24-2010, 04:13 AM   #78
Darth Vader
Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Romania
Distribution: DARKSTAR Linux 2008.1
Posts: 625

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
If you want to know the opinion of someone who has played with Slackware, in different x86 architectures.

The biggest improvement will be observed by switching from i486 to i586 with the use of MMX extensions, especially in older systems. I.e. MPlayer and Xine will run better in a old machine.

However, by switching to i686, will lost compatibility with some processors, will not see substantial improvements beyond i586 and will open a cup of worms. Various applications will crash or fail mysteriously. I guess because of (wrong) optimizations applied by compiler.

In fact, if you're curious how it will look on a i686 Slackware, try Arch Linux. You will notice some instability.

Therefore no major distributions use i686 architecture as default, the common case is i586.

If Patrick wants to change its Slackware architecture, I suggest him to use the i586 too, if he wants to avoid stability problems.
 
2 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Samba 3.3.4 ADS support not compiled in chackercon Linux - Server 8 05-29-2009 12:57 AM
Why is proftpd compiled without nls support? guanx Slackware 14 03-12-2009 02:54 PM
driver wi fi support on two compiled kernel!!! agostain Linux - Hardware 0 01-07-2009 07:17 AM
LDAP: not compiled with SASL support G00fy Programming 0 12-26-2007 02:33 AM
mandrake 9.2 rc1 acpi compiled as modules fuzzhead85 Mandriva 1 09-10-2003 03:44 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration