SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
interesting. i think i was about 15 years old or so when i486 was being used. I guess some people collect antique computers and run slackware on them? But as long as its 686 optimized there shouldn't be a problem.
Changing Slackware to be compiled for i686 (instead of only being optimized for it) would not only kick i486 CPUs out of the game, but also i586 compatible CPUs (Pentium, Cyrix/IBM 6x86, Winchip CPUs, AMD's K5, K6, K6-II, K6-III and older Geode, some older VIA C3, many embedded designs that I can't mention all here). Many of these are still in use around the world, especially in countries where computer parts aren't cheap or where other things just matter more than upgrading the computer.
Here are three side notes as I like posting in [SOLVED] threads
(1) A similar question, with a poll, was asked a while ago, see this thread
(2) Another question is: "do we still need to support non-smp i486 kernel in Slackware". It was already asked but It would have deserved more reasoned answers, or more developed rationale in the answers IMO
(3) On the other hand don't ask to support back all 386 CPUs as it's probably too late if we are to use a 3.8 or newer kernel, see here...
Last edited by Didier Spaier; 01-18-2013 at 02:09 AM.
Reason: typo corrected
# Why i486 and not i386? Because the shared C++ libraries in gcc-3.2.x will
# require 486 opcodes even when a 386 target is used (so we already weren't
# compatible with the i386 for Slackware 9.0, didn't notive, and nobody
# complained :-). gcc-3.3 fixes this issue and allows you to build a 386
# compiler, but the fix is done in a way that produces binaries that are not
# compatible with gcc-3.2.x compiled binaries. To retain compatibility with
# Slackware 9.0, we'll have to use i486 (or better) as the compiler target
# for gcc-3.3.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.