SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
On my Slack-13.1 machine here (which is actually -current currently) I'm still using a little tiny WM called "i3" and am happy with this situation. It runs one single little process - any other processes related to it are for stuff I have on my "taskbar" or infobar at bottom of the screen.
I still get miffed if/when I start up a KDE application such as KWrite, and notice that that one application starts a dozen other processes, most of which are still hanging around indefinitely, long after I have closed KWrite. Then I go on a KDE killing spree.
I use XFCE, its very fast but not that minimalist, have a great look and its growing.
I like to see more effort in Slackware for these DE, so I seeing what people use.
I want to know if I'm battling a lose battle
I've used XFCE a few times on some of my machines. It's certainly a lot faster than KDE and it has a clean interface. Slackbuilds.org has a bunch of packages for various XFCE plugins, so other slackers want to use it too. :-)
FLuxbox, try the others on a whim now and again, but as someone said once already and I agree, KDE just opens so many processes for just simple apps my concience won't allow me to use it more than a day.
XFCE on the other hand is nifty, but for all intents and purposes Fluxbox and some menu edits has been more than enough for a long time now.
This begs the question of why? Why do folks feel they need a DE, what advantage/disadvantage does anyone see in the various ones available?