LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


View Poll Results: When do you update/upgrade the kernel ?
I use one that comes with my version of Slackware 108 60.34%
I use a stable LTS branch 19 10.61%
I use the most recent stable branch 44 24.58%
I use the mainline kernel (RCs and development) 14 7.82%
I update/upgrade for features or device support 42 23.46%
I update/upgrade for security fixes 43 24.02%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 179. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-28-2013, 02:25 PM   #16
Stephen Morgan
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2011
Location: England
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 164

Rep: Reputation: 19

Quote:
Originally Posted by sycamorex View Post
I used to compile my kernels... not anymore.
Some of us have systems than randomly seize up without specially patched kernels. So why not keep rolling on forwards? That and using the Zen kernel means I'm constantly upgrading to the new release, 3.8.10-zen+ currently.
 
Old 04-28-2013, 03:01 PM   #17
Bazzaah
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2007
Distribution: Slackware64-current, Slackware64 14
Posts: 331

Rep: Reputation: 50
I've compiled a new kernel on a few occasions, really for no reason other than to find out how and learn a bit about the kernel. Really though Pat's kernels are more than fine for my fairly old machine (3 years+), but, that said, I may well switch to 3.9.x from 3.8.6 (on 14.0) when that comes out.
 
Old 04-28-2013, 03:02 PM   #18
AceofSpades19
Senior Member
 
Registered: Feb 2007
Location: Chilliwack,BC.Canada
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 2,079

Rep: Reputation: 58
I always stick with the -current kernel unless there is a good reason to run a different one
 
Old 04-28-2013, 05:57 PM   #19
D1ver
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2010
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 598
Blog Entries: 3

Rep: Reputation: 194Reputation: 194
I've got a server running in my living room running 14.0 which will be keeping the default kernel until the hard drive gives out..

However on my day to day laptop I tend to get the itch now and then and compile a new kernel.. There are a bunch of bug fixes and such between 3.2.29 and 3.2.44, which I figured would be good to get.. However when I tried to run a later 3.2.x series kernel I was getting hard lock ups, so I've jumped to 3.4.37, which is running great.
 
Old 04-29-2013, 02:52 AM   #20
kooru
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,385

Rep: Reputation: 275Reputation: 275Reputation: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by ozar View Post
I generally stick with the default kernel unless there is a good reason to upgrade.
me too.
 
Old 04-29-2013, 05:06 AM   #21
andrew.46
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,365

Rep: Reputation: 493Reputation: 493Reputation: 493Reputation: 493Reputation: 493
I try to stay with the stock kernel but I just saw that 3.9 has been released so here we go again....
 
Old 04-29-2013, 06:20 AM   #22
brianL
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Slackware64 15; SlackwareARM-current (aarch64); Debian 12
Posts: 8,298
Blog Entries: 61

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I use the default generic kernel plus initrd. I've only tampered with the kernel once: before Slack64 came out, I enabled HIGHMEM64 (or whatever) to get the full benefit of my RAM.
 
Old 04-29-2013, 06:35 AM   #23
TobiSGD
Moderator
 
Registered: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Distribution: Whatever fits the task best
Posts: 17,148
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886Reputation: 4886
Usually I use the kernel that comes with Slackware. For my experiments I use the latest stable kernel.
 
Old 04-29-2013, 08:42 AM   #24
1337_powerslacker
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2009
Location: Kansas, USA
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0
Posts: 862
Blog Entries: 9

Rep: Reputation: 592Reputation: 592Reputation: 592Reputation: 592Reputation: 592Reputation: 592
Quote:
Originally Posted by eyeofliberty View Post
Haha, kernel-hopping. What Slackware users do because they're already found the best distro?
Epic, dude! That one's worth putting as my signature
 
Old 04-29-2013, 08:53 AM   #25
JWJones
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,444

Rep: Reputation: 709Reputation: 709Reputation: 709Reputation: 709Reputation: 709Reputation: 709Reputation: 709
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattallmill View Post
Epic, dude! That one's worth putting as my signature
Thanks! And I just noticed, and fixed, my spelling error. D'oh!
 
Old 04-29-2013, 08:58 AM   #26
cynwulf
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,727

Rep: Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367Reputation: 2367
I try to keep with the latest stable kernel, but don't upgrade every time there's an update because compiling the kernel is very time consuming on my hardware. I tend to just download the full kernel source - because patching has never gone well for me...
 
Old 04-29-2013, 10:38 AM   #27
AlleyTrotter
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Coal Township PA
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0
Posts: 783

Rep: Reputation: 479Reputation: 479Reputation: 479Reputation: 479Reputation: 479
The kernel developers being the experts, I upgrade as soon as they release to STABLE.
 
Old 04-29-2013, 10:39 AM   #28
cpuobsessed
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: Fedora, Ubuntu, Slackware
Posts: 56

Rep: Reputation: 15
Can't go past 3.4

Anything past 3.4.x breaks my video (ATI Radeon X2300)
Something to do with how it detects the monitor in KMS, if I replace the code for the radeon-kms from 3.4 kernel it works.
 
Old 04-29-2013, 10:44 AM   #29
PrinceCruise
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2009
Location: /Universe/Earth/India/Pune
Distribution: Slackware64 -Current
Posts: 890

Rep: Reputation: 186Reputation: 186
3.2.29-huge-smp has been working almost perfectly on my laptop thus far, so I haven't needed Kernel fiddling. Though I compiled 3.4.8 on my test install and it worked great but with udevd hiccups, may be my fault.
Stable-kernel for me any day.

Regards.
 
Old 04-29-2013, 11:06 AM   #30
colorpurple21859
LQ Veteran
 
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: florida panhandle
Distribution: Slackware Debian, Fedora, others
Posts: 7,346

Rep: Reputation: 1589Reputation: 1589Reputation: 1589Reputation: 1589Reputation: 1589Reputation: 1589Reputation: 1589Reputation: 1589Reputation: 1589Reputation: 1589Reputation: 1589
I usually stick with what is shipped with slackware. I'll use other kernels to fix driver problems which of late have involved ati/nvidia video cards problems.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to exclude kernel* from apt-get update upgrade? pridefc Ubuntu 5 09-20-2011 11:32 AM
upgrade kernel on redhat enterprise rel 3 update 4 pyroman59 Linux - Newbie 5 08-20-2009 10:53 AM
Mandriva: How do I update/upgrade my kernel...? rm_-rf_windows Linux - Kernel 2 07-07-2007 07:55 AM
Kernel upgrade/update?? Can I ... Basrah Linux - Newbie 2 03-02-2006 11:16 AM
Does Apt-get dist-upgrade automatically update the kernel? adamb10 Ubuntu 2 07-10-2005 10:57 AM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:32 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration