LinuxQuestions.org

LinuxQuestions.org (/questions/)
-   Slackware (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/)
-   -   What's wrong with Slackware (https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/slackware-14/whats-wrong-with-slackware-4175563963/)

Didier Spaier 01-14-2016 05:51 PM

Sometimes I would like to be a pope. But that lasts only 27'39".

PS. This reminds me what wrote Cioran: "S'il y a quelqu'un qui doit tout à Bach, c'est bien Dieu."

Yes, this is off topic. But is there one?

Sylvester Ink 01-14-2016 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by enorbet (Post 5478347)
On a purely pragmatic level I'd like to ask what would be the downside of disabling PulseAudio? In my case, at least in the past, it has not played nicely with Jack which is extremely important to me as I often use my PC as a DAW. I don't foresee ever requiring BlueZ, so is that the extent of the loss?

How does it work out if you reconfigure pulseaudio as a dumb pipe to alsa, as described here:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php...b_pipe_to_ALSA
That should give the best of both worlds, with pa-reliant programs running fine, without disrupting sensitive software, like Jack.

dugan 01-14-2016 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sylvester Ink (Post 5478368)
How does it work out if you reconfigure pulseaudio as a dumb pipe to alsa, as described here:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php...b_pipe_to_ALSA
That should give the best of both worlds, with pa-reliant programs running fine, without disrupting sensitive software, like Jack.

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...7/#post5477687

Bertman123 01-14-2016 06:41 PM

If it's one thing that I've learned over the years it's not what you do, but how you do it. I trust Pat and his team to do what is right for Slackware and personally I like pulseaudio.

mister_b 01-14-2016 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by astrogeek (Post 5478316)
YIKES!!! I thought you wrote Hillary and was about to call l'hôpital psychiatrique!

But I agree, Hilary is much better listening, and looking!

On that note, one could certainly do worse than Yuja Wang to get one's Pulse going.

a4z 01-15-2016 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bassmadrigal (Post 5478315)
I'll say this and then just step away...



How many of those posts were from Pat? Most of that rhetoric was thrown around by a few key individuals that are not involved in the Slackware development. Pat fixes problems... there was a problem with BlueZ 5, so he fixed it by adding pulseaudio. If he deems that there are insurmountable problems presented by not having PAM, then he is likely to do the same there.

I never saw Pat and team say they aren't adding pulseaudio/PAM/systemd/etc because it goes against the UNIX philosophy or that it doesn't follow the KISS principle.

hey, there is a problem with central authentication in Slackware, is simply does not work. Not fixed since years.
So no, it is not like that only technical reasons matter.

Richard Cranium 01-15-2016 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by a4z (Post 5478473)
hey, there is a problem with central authentication in Slackware, is simply does not work. Not fixed since years.
So no, it is not like that only technical reasons matter.

Did you mean there is a problem with central authentication that doesn't use NIS in Slackware?

a4z 01-15-2016 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard Cranium (Post 5478479)
Did you mean there is a problem with central authentication that doesn't use NIS in Slackware?

NIS :doh: how could I forget about this?

possible because it was ok until lets say more than 1 decade ago and most environment have different requirements today?

Didier Spaier 01-15-2016 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by a4z (Post 5478473)
hey, there is a problem with central authentication in Slackware, is simply does not work. Not fixed since years.

Not a bug, rather the lack of a feature. But Pat has clearly stated that this feature will not be provided in Slackware 14.2, so what's the point of asking again now?

Richard Cranium 01-15-2016 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by a4z (Post 5478495)
NIS :doh: how could I forget about this?

possible because it was ok until lets say more than 1 decade ago and most environment have different requirements today?

You should be more precise in your whining.

a4z 01-15-2016 04:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Richard Cranium (Post 5478511)
You should be more precise in your whining.

:o , I am sorry to hear about your lack of fantasy and that you are not able to think about an environment with multibe apps and computers and users.
imagine for example something common:
Source control management, build servers, wiki, time tracking, the normal file sharing stuff and some other apps, all which need login and also being able to log in on many machines but not all, but one password. change on any system works instance for all apps and systems. an ddifferete OS. now you install a server in this environment so run say trac, you will set this up with NIS?
and than you join for a project in this environment and bring your notebook , what software do you need and do all processional useful distributions provide out of the box? you mean NIS? how many such environments have you build, or worked in with your Slackware workstation? Zero or Null?

ReaperX7 01-15-2016 04:25 AM

How many packages would need to be rebuilt to use Linux-PAM, if it ever got added, and how many packages would require rebuilds each time Linux-PAM was either patched or upgraded to avoid dependency issues?

Now who is going to maintain those packages?

Captain Pinkeye 01-15-2016 05:27 AM

Thanks for the Pulseaudio. Seriously.

bassmadrigal 01-15-2016 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by a4z (Post 5478473)
hey, there is a problem with central authentication in Slackware, is simply does not work. Not fixed since years.
So no, it is not like that only technical reasons matter.

I think you missed the part where I said "If he deems that there are insurmountable problems presented by not having PAM, then he is likely to do the same there."

Plenty of people have "problems" by not having certain software shipped in Slackware. I have a "problem" using Slackware as my media center OS because it doesn't include kodi and its dependencies, but it isn't a "problem" in Pat's eyes, so there is no need for him to fix it (and I don't see the need to force my "problem" onto Pat). That means it's on me to get things running as I see fit (which is what Slackware is all about).

Obviously, Pat doesn't have a need to use central authentication, so it isn't a "problem" in his eyes that PAM is not included (which means there's no reason for him to fix it). That means it is left up to the user to tailor Slackware to their needs.

If Pat catered to everyone's "problems", Slackware would cease to be what it is and would probably end up on 20 DVDs and require 1TB of hard drive space to get a full install.

Didier Spaier 01-15-2016 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bassmadrigal (Post 5478615)
If Pat catered to everyone's "problems", Slackware would cease to be what it is and would probably end up on 20 DVDs and require 1TB of hard drive space to get a full install.

IOW Slackware would be Debian ;)

PS Yes I know that a merge has been considered by Ian and Pat long ago. But I doubt that this will happen now.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43 AM.