SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I got a question about using Slackware on a 486. I know a 486 can handle Slack, but I'm just wondering what might be a good version for it. For anyone who says I can use the current 10.2 version please explain the benefits and downfalls to using it. Thanks a lot and any information you can provide is good enough for me.
Last edited by digital_nite; 09-26-2005 at 06:14 PM.
I agree with the previous posters, 10.2 will run on the unit.
How much RAM do you have? On a 486, 64 MB RAM would run x windows, albeit slowly. I think 32 MB RAM might work, but, it would be deathly slow.
I'm running !0.2 on a Pll 266 with 128 MB RAM, with XFce4. and it runs well.
Doesn't your question depend on what you want to use the computer for?
I recently put Slack 10.1 on a P2 266 and only had to change the window manager to a very light one to make sure it worked ok.
The only issue I can think of is that as a general rule, if you put modern software on an old PC, you get support for features and problems that are not available to you e.g.usb. so you might be better off using an older version of Slackware such as version 7 or one tuned for older hardware.
I agree with Krugger and F0ul_Olli. When you do install it choose the packages carefully. You won't need everything, and f your hard drive is <=2G a full install won't leave much space. I have a P233 box with 64MB RAM running 9.1 with CL only, all X and gui packages removed, tuned to fit on a 1.2G disk. It has ~500MB free.
The current version of Slack should work fine, but it's really going to depend on what kind of hardware you have and what you want to do with it.
If you plan to use an X environment 32MB RAM might work but 64 would be better, and you'll want to stick with a light window manager such as XFCE or Fluxbox.
Thanks to everyone for their posts. I will consider getting a current version of Slackware (the 10.2 version). However, I will also look to have a version that fits my needs. I'll keep my eye out for the largest hard drive I can put on my system. And who knows if my knowledge of Slack starts to peak and eventually get stiffled on the 486, I'll defintely be building a new system. For now though I wanna see what I can get out of the 486 sitting at home.