LinuxQuestions.org
LinuxAnswers - the LQ Linux tutorial section.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 11-11-2006, 09:31 PM   #1
M$ISBS
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 820

Rep: Reputation: 30
What kernel should I use? Pros/Cons....


I will be installing slack 11 from a disk I bought from slackware.com.

I am using 2.4 kernel now, What would be the upside of using 2.6, wireless support, DVD support?
Is 2.4 more secure?

Thanks.
 
Old 11-11-2006, 11:10 PM   #2
suid0
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Location: Brazil
Distribution: Slackware, openSuSe, Ubuntu, Fedora
Posts: 56

Rep: Reputation: 16
Smile

My suggestion to that is:
Only change your kernel version if a major bug is found on the version you are running or if you need a resource that is now supported in a new kernel version.
There are also another things like making your machine faster or boot faster but I think if you know how to do a good tuning of your 2.4.x, this won't be a problem.
 
Old 11-11-2006, 11:46 PM   #3
uglydot
Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 232

Rep: Reputation: 30
2.6 is faster. You can patch the 2.4 kernel and play with it a bit to make up the speed difference, but I find it far easier to just install the latest 2.6 and let it be happy.
 
Old 11-12-2006, 11:23 AM   #4
M$ISBS
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 820

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
How is the 2.6 kernel faster? will I see kde come up faster? Do I need to compile a new kernel if I want to use 2.6? I have the store purchased slack 11.
Thanks.
 
Old 11-12-2006, 11:58 AM   #5
tuxdev
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2005
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,014

Rep: Reputation: 115Reputation: 115
2.6 has full udev support. Also, 2.6 is faster because of all the lockless and waitless process and resource management.
 
Old 11-12-2006, 09:07 PM   #6
M$ISBS
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Posts: 820

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 30
What is udev support?
 
Old 11-12-2006, 10:57 PM   #7
davidsrsb
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Distribution: Slackware 13.37 current
Posts: 770

Rep: Reputation: 33
2.6 has much finer grained process locking than 2.4, this makes 2.6 feel mor responsive on a basic PC.
If you have a dual core box, 2.6 is in a different league as 2.4 SMP is "crude"
 
Old 11-13-2006, 09:07 AM   #8
allend
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Melbourne
Distribution: Slackware-current
Posts: 3,517

Rep: Reputation: 873Reputation: 873Reputation: 873Reputation: 873Reputation: 873Reputation: 873Reputation: 873
I find that the 2.6 kernel is much faster to boot and generally more responsive in operation on my old desktop box.
If you want to run versions of Wine later than 0.9.12, then you will need to run a 2.4 kernel that has been compiled with NPTL (Native Posix Thread Library) support (rather than the vanilla 2.4 kernel supplied in Slackware 11), or else use the 2.6 kernel that has NPTL support already enabled.
At work I administer several simple file and print servers. I am sticking with the 2.4 kernel on these boxes at this time as it is adequate to task and it has proven stability.
 
Old 11-13-2006, 09:23 AM   #9
titopoquito
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Ruhr Area, Germany
Distribution: Slackware64 14.0
Posts: 1,525

Rep: Reputation: 94
Quote:
Originally Posted by M$ISBS
What is udev support?
udev is a replacement for devfs (which you have used with 2.4 kernel and which is no longer maintained). It is responsible for creating device links in /dev and sending udev events to the kernel's hotplug system so that the right kernel modules can be loaded for your hardware.

So to use kernel 2.6.x you need udev. The old hotplug system (a seperate package, is not the same as the kernel's hotplug system) and devfs are not used anymore.

Hit me if that is wrong in some part, but this is how I understand what udev is doing
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
pros/cons of getting a G5 Tomasfuego Linux - Hardware 4 06-07-2005 05:53 AM
Gnome 2.8 Pros and Cons maelstrom209 Linux - Software 0 01-27-2005 03:36 AM
Pros and cons of upgrading to 2.6? Darklion Slackware 17 12-10-2004 03:35 AM
Pros/Cons - Using Swaret to upgrade kernel? JockVSJock Slackware 9 06-01-2004 04:18 AM
pros/cons of Distributions Surfmonkey Linux - Newbie 1 11-26-2003 02:46 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:44 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration