Go Job Hunting at the LQ Job Marketplace
Go Back > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.


Search this Thread
Old 09-01-2012, 10:03 AM   #1
Registered: Nov 2004
Distribution: Slackware/Solaris
Posts: 577

Rep: Reputation: 30
What is NetworkManager ???

What is NetworkManager ?
The description in rc.d is kind of enigmatic:

This is a daemon for automatically switching network \ connections to the best available connection.
Sounds like M$ idea - "dont touch anything - system will think for you and decide for you".

Can I not to install it and manage my network connection like always before with rc.inet1.conf ?
Old 09-01-2012, 10:09 AM   #2
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: dallas, tx
Distribution: Slackware - current multilib/gsb Arch
Posts: 1,949
Blog Entries: 8

Rep: Reputation: 201Reputation: 201Reputation: 201
You don't have to use networkmanager. I like it on my laptop much more than WICD, but I don't use it on any of my desktop machines. I don't believe it will start the daemon without you making it's rc. executable.
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-01-2012, 11:53 AM   #3
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,133
Blog Entries: 6

Rep: Reputation: 223Reputation: 223Reputation: 223
That's not the best description of what NetworkManager is/does.

If you have a stationary PC with a wired connection, you most likely wouldn't need/want NetworkManager. Nor if you have a computer that connects wirelessly to the same, never changing access point.

If you're a road warrior and use your laptop at various places that have a multitude of access points, NetworkManager does make is easier to connect to different access points, remembers access points, allows on the fly access point switching, supports VPN, will prompt you when an open unencrypted access point is available, and and various other tasks I've failed to mention.

You do have full control over the connection(s) with NetworkManager.
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-01-2012, 12:22 PM   #4
Didier Spaier
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slackware{,64}-{14.1,current} on a Lenovo Thinkpad T61 6457-4XG
Posts: 4,300

Rep: Reputation: 1063Reputation: 1063Reputation: 1063Reputation: 1063Reputation: 1063Reputation: 1063Reputation: 1063Reputation: 1063
@czezz: the only thing that have changed is that you have one more possibility to set up your network:
- you still can set it up by hand editing the network scripts,
- you can use Network Manager,
- you can set it up with "netconfig", which in addition allows you in upcoming Slackware 14 to set up Network Manager,
- you can use wicd in /extra.

And of course if /etc/rc.d/rc.networkmanager is not executable Network Manager won't be launched at startup.

Last edited by Didier Spaier; 09-01-2012 at 12:23 PM.
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-01-2012, 02:50 PM   #5
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2005
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,441

Rep: Reputation: 70
Just keep in mind that if for some odd reason you have *both* wicd and NetworkManager running on startup, that wicd will take precedence

Originally Posted by /etc/rc.d/rc.M
# Start wicd or networkmanager:
if [ -x /etc/rc.d/rc.wicd ]; then
sh /etc/rc.d/rc.wicd start
elif [ -x /etc/rc.d/rc.networkmanager ]; then
sh /etc/rc.d/rc.networkmanager start
Old 09-01-2012, 03:27 PM   #6
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: WA
Distribution: Slackware64 14.1, Slackware 14.1
Posts: 523

Rep: Reputation: 140Reputation: 140
I like WICD. For what it does, it does well and without a lot of crap. Networkmanger works fine, most of the time, but if you just need a simple road warrior wired/wifi manager, WICD is superior, IMHO. That said, I prefer WICD to take precedence. I think the IF stanza was either the author's personal preference, or just the luck of the draw.
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-01-2012, 03:38 PM   #7
Senior Member
Registered: Jul 2011
Distribution: LFS-SVN, FreeBSD 10.0
Posts: 3,276
Blog Entries: 15

Rep: Reputation: 876Reputation: 876Reputation: 876Reputation: 876Reputation: 876Reputation: 876Reputation: 876
NetworkManager also supports other protocols and configurations WICD might not support.

It also has various plugins like ModemManager, pptp, vpnc, and openconnect which might not be supported by WICD. ModemManager's plugin is useful because it can handle ADSL and 3G/4G connections through NetworkManager. I'm sure if it does Dial-Up but most Slackware installs have kppp which comes with KDE which does support Dial-Up anyway.

It may seem more automated for what it does, but the design is very well done and works for a variety of configurations to meet any need for connectivity.
2 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-01-2012, 04:21 PM   #8
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 4,177

Rep: Reputation: 541Reputation: 541Reputation: 541Reputation: 541Reputation: 541Reputation: 541
I'm using WICD at the moment on my netbook and it does the job just fine for my needs. I've also used networkmanager and it works very well. Take your pick.
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-01-2012, 07:10 PM   #9
Registered: Jun 2008
Posts: 310

Rep: Reputation: 45
Since I'm waiting for the release, I haven't got network manager running yet, but I do have one minor (sort of) concern: it isn't CLI friendly--that's one thing wicd has over it, easily. OTOH, I've always had problems with wicd: races where an interface is never brought up and you have to do it manually from it's control panel, and encryption not working most of the time. I'm hoping the new wicd patches fix this, otherwise I guess I'll be using network manager.
Old 09-01-2012, 10:13 PM   #10
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: Indonesia
Distribution: Slackware Linux
Posts: 51

Rep: Reputation: 8
I like WICD. For what it does, it does well and without a lot of crap. Networkmanger works fine, most of the time, but if you just need a simple road warrior wired/wifi manager, WICD is superior, IMHO.
on that note, NetworkManager is needed if u want more integration with KDE (CMMIW)


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NetworkManager Rory Glenn Pascua Linux - Software 3 06-15-2012 12:18 PM
No NetworkManager! cynpeterson Linux - Wireless Networking 5 02-19-2012 10:05 PM
[SOLVED] NetworkManager Ipozya Arch 9 01-20-2011 09:22 AM
NetworkManager dbswifty Linux - Newbie 6 08-23-2010 05:05 PM
Besides NetworkManager, shreks Fedora 1 01-18-2006 02:26 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 PM.

Main Menu
Write for LQ is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration