SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Introduction to Linux - A Hands on Guide
This guide was created as an overview of the Linux Operating System, geared toward new users as an exploration tour and getting started guide, with exercises at the end of each chapter.
For more advanced trainees it can be a desktop reference, and a collection of the base knowledge needed to proceed with system and network administration. This book contains many real life examples derived from the author's experience as a Linux system and network administrator, trainer and consultant. They hope these examples will help you to get a better understanding of the Linux system and that you feel encouraged to try out things on your own.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free.
I've been using Nvu and it has a lot of short comings. I've got others, Frontpage is out of the question. I really don't use it unless I have too.
Edit: WYSIWYG is my desire, sure emacs, vi or any editor would do. But I like the look of Nvu, just that it falls short in documentation, themes, etc.
As far as I'm concerned web-development and
WYSIWYG are mutually exclusive, even though one
can enforce many things with CSS these days.
If my browser forces a different font your page
won't look what you think it should be, anyway,
so - what's the point? Try to think "sensible"
and "portable" (cater for people who are vision
impaired, or people who don't have that 1280x
960 resolution you had in mind when designing).
And do that with plain tools that generate slick
HTML that will load quickly on a wonky modem, too.
Good reference point! My needs are to keep things simple along with making the pages visually pleasing not cluttered. I really use a editor then publish the pages. I just want to experiment with other web author tools. Garnish information about what others are using to work on pages both professionally and personally.
I've tried Nvu, but find it has shortfalls. I downloaded Quanta+ but have not installed yet too allow a test session.
Your point about visually impaired is a important but generally ignored rule of thought. I will keep that in mind for future reference.
I sometimes use the mozilla composer which is mostly the same code as nvu. But I usually only use it with scarefully selected templates which provide very simple and generic code which can be correctly displayed with dillo. I check everything against mozilla/firefox, opera and dillo. That means no tables or other weird stuff.
But I also use whatever editor is at hand, such as erwin and sometimes bluefish.
I use wysiwyg because I just want to get it done fast and not fancy -I hate writing web-pages.
When I have more time I'll be writing an article outlining all the ways to get gedit customized for use as a web developers editor.
I spent a lot of time trying various tools for web development when I switched to Linux. I wrote an article on some of my findings: Web Development in Linux (GNOME)
Quanta Plus is the nearest I've got to using a WYSIWYG. I did try Dreamweaver a long time ago but I don't like the way it makes the code.
I like to keep my HTML tidy and use CSS a lot. Using the F6 key I can get an immediate preview, and if you must see your changes as they happen, it has a split screen VPL+Source mode which seems to do that. I keep snippets of code for re-use in a separate file for each website, and usually build a template first, and then modify that as I go along.
I tried Nvu but didn't like it. Can't remember why.
Bluefish looks good, but I haven't had a chance to try it properly. I got put off by it not having a built in preview mode.