LinuxQuestions.org
Welcome to the most active Linux Forum on the web.
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 06-30-2007, 06:33 PM   #16
yechi yisrael
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Distribution: slack
Posts: 1

Rep: Reputation: 0

I used Arachnophilia for a while, now I just use the gnome gedit editor for HTML and CSS.


Yechi Yisrael.
 
Old 06-30-2007, 07:30 PM   #17
Tinkster
Moderator
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: in a fallen world
Distribution: slackware by choice, others too :} ... android.
Posts: 22,978
Blog Entries: 11

Rep: Reputation: 879Reputation: 879Reputation: 879Reputation: 879Reputation: 879Reputation: 879Reputation: 879
Quote:
Originally Posted by onebuck
Hi,

Not a poll!

I've been using Nvu and it has a lot of short comings. I've got others, Frontpage is out of the question. I really don't use it unless I have too.

Any suggestions?

Edit: WYSIWYG is my desire, sure emacs, vi or any editor would do. But I like the look of Nvu, just that it falls short in documentation, themes, etc.
As far as I'm concerned web-development and
WYSIWYG are mutually exclusive, even though one
can enforce many things with CSS these days.

If my browser forces a different font your page
won't look what you think it should be, anyway,
so - what's the point? Try to think "sensible"
and "portable" (cater for people who are vision
impaired, or people who don't have that 1280x
960 resolution you had in mind when designing).

And do that with plain tools that generate slick
HTML that will load quickly on a wonky modem, too.

Oh, and I use vim/emacs ...


Cheers,
Tink
 
Old 07-02-2007, 07:39 AM   #18
onebuck
Moderator
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Midwest USA, Central Illinois
Distribution: SlackwareŽ
Posts: 11,204
Blog Entries: 3

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1433Reputation: 1433Reputation: 1433Reputation: 1433Reputation: 1433Reputation: 1433Reputation: 1433Reputation: 1433Reputation: 1433Reputation: 1433
Hi,

Good reference point! My needs are to keep things simple along with making the pages visually pleasing not cluttered. I really use a editor then publish the pages. I just want to experiment with other web author tools. Garnish information about what others are using to work on pages both professionally and personally.

I've tried Nvu, but find it has shortfalls. I downloaded Quanta+ but have not installed yet too allow a test session.

Your point about visually impaired is a important but generally ignored rule of thought. I will keep that in mind for future reference.
 
Old 07-02-2007, 08:24 AM   #19
gnashley
Amigo developer
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,755

Rep: Reputation: 466Reputation: 466Reputation: 466Reputation: 466Reputation: 466
I sometimes use the mozilla composer which is mostly the same code as nvu. But I usually only use it with scarefully selected templates which provide very simple and generic code which can be correctly displayed with dillo. I check everything against mozilla/firefox, opera and dillo. That means no tables or other weird stuff.
But I also use whatever editor is at hand, such as erwin and sometimes bluefish.
I use wysiwyg because I just want to get it done fast and not fancy -I hate writing web-pages.
 
Old 07-02-2007, 09:00 AM   #20
hitest
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 4,173

Rep: Reputation: 539Reputation: 539Reputation: 539Reputation: 539Reputation: 539Reputation: 539
My websites are very spartan and simple so a text editor like Kate or gedit works for me. I do like Quanta Plus:-)
 
Old 07-03-2007, 02:03 AM   #21
Hendronicus
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2006
Location: Oldsmar, Fl. USA
Distribution: Slackware, Ubuntu
Posts: 173

Rep: Reputation: 38
Quanta Plus for the big stuff, Kate for the little things, and Nedit if I'm in a real hurry. Mozilla Composer isn't bad for simple text-based sites.
 
Old 07-03-2007, 07:56 AM   #22
Basslord1124
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Ashland, KY
Distribution: Debian, Puppy/Slacko
Posts: 351

Rep: Reputation: 31
Quanta looks nice but I have never used it. I usually stick with bluefish.
 
Old 09-28-2007, 07:55 PM   #23
MicahCarrick
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Distribution: Fedora
Posts: 241

Rep: Reputation: 31
I had a few problems with Bluefish in the past. I use gedit. It seems limited at first, however, once you enable some plug-ins, it's quite effective. And it's VERY stable which is key for me. I use the file manager pane plugin (configured GnomeVFS to enable FTP writing), snippets library plugin, external tools to validate and format PHP and HTML, and a few other small things. It works great for what I do which is mostly PHP, HTML, CSS, Javascript, and the occasional Ruby or RoR (there's a plugin to make it work like text mate on mac).

When I have more time I'll be writing an article outlining all the ways to get gedit customized for use as a web developers editor.

I spent a lot of time trying various tools for web development when I switched to Linux. I wrote an article on some of my findings: Web Development in Linux (GNOME)
 
Old 09-28-2007, 08:55 PM   #24
sadiqdm
Member
 
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: London, UK
Distribution: openSUSE, Ubuntu
Posts: 357

Rep: Reputation: 35
Quanta Plus is the nearest I've got to using a WYSIWYG. I did try Dreamweaver a long time ago but I don't like the way it makes the code.

I like to keep my HTML tidy and use CSS a lot. Using the F6 key I can get an immediate preview, and if you must see your changes as they happen, it has a split screen VPL+Source mode which seems to do that. I keep snippets of code for re-use in a separate file for each website, and usually build a template first, and then modify that as I go along.

I tried Nvu but didn't like it. Can't remember why.

Bluefish looks good, but I haven't had a chance to try it properly. I got put off by it not having a built in preview mode.
 
Old 09-29-2007, 01:23 AM   #25
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
Of course you could just use FF to preview it, just click the refresh button whenever you want to see what it looks like. (yeah, I know it's low tech solution, it must be integrated)
 
  


Reply

Tags
css, dreamweaver, frontpage, nvu, quanta, wysiwyg


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Web Authoring Tools tubatodd Slackware 8 05-27-2009 09:52 AM
Lindows.... what do you slackers.. think about it Linux_Inside Slackware 33 12-20-2003 12:42 AM
Salute Slackers ArnaudVR Slackware 13 11-05-2003 01:02 PM
Cool graphics/multimedia/web authoring tool for free? Buttercups General 8 09-06-2002 03:35 AM
What is popular web authoring tool? concoran Linux - General 3 12-25-2001 06:30 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:05 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration