LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

View Poll Results: What architecture do you run Slackware on ?
i486 8 4.57%
i586 16 9.14%
i686 95 54.29%
x86_64 122 69.71%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 175. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 09-27-2010, 03:00 PM   #1
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
What architecture do you run Slackware on ? (for proposed switch to i686)


As stated in the other thread, Pat V was wondering whether to switch from i486 to i686, so this poll may help answer that question.

EDIT:
Mostly those who run newer versions of Slackware should answer, because running an ancient version of slackware on an i486 is much more likely than on a newer version. It might be helpful if you actually do run an i486 to state what version of slackware ...

Last edited by H_TeXMeX_H; 09-27-2010 at 03:23 PM.
 
Click here to see the post LQ members have rated as the most helpful post in this thread.
Old 09-27-2010, 03:12 PM   #2
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 5,240

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Quote:
Originally Posted by H_TeXMeX_H View Post
As stated in the other thread, Pat V is wondering whether to switch from i486 to i686, so this poll may help answer that question.
Make that "Pat V was wondering" - he wrote about that on twitter 10 months ago. Apparently without relevant feedback. If he still considers it he is silent about the idea.
And like business_kid said in another post, building for i586 instead of i686 will at least not leave the Pentium, Pentium MMX, AMD K5/K6 and some of the VIA CPUs like the C3 out in the cold (I'm still running a C3).

Eric
 
Old 09-27-2010, 03:24 PM   #3
H_TeXMeX_H
Guru
 
Registered: Oct 2005
Location: $RANDOM
Distribution: slackware64
Posts: 12,928
Blog Entries: 2

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269Reputation: 1269
Ok, it is fixed. You don't get much feedback on twitter, and this poll is only to see how the user base is distributed with respect to architecture ... which may help with this decision if it is being considered.
 
Old 09-27-2010, 03:27 PM   #4
GazL
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 3,383

Rep: Reputation: 914Reputation: 914Reputation: 914Reputation: 914Reputation: 914Reputation: 914Reputation: 914Reputation: 914
As I said in the other thread, I have an old P3-800 mothballed, but if I were to bring it out of retirement I wouldn't run it on anything newer than slackware 12.2.

My main system is x86_64.

Last edited by GazL; 09-27-2010 at 03:47 PM.
 
Old 09-27-2010, 03:38 PM   #5
sahko
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2008
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,041

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
I think it would be advisable for people who vote for other than i686 and x86_64 to state which Slackware version they are using, more importantly if they are not using the latest.
Otherwise this poll doesnt mean that much even if Pat IS considering to switch.
There are people still running 8.1 ..

edit. oh damn, H_TeXMeX_H said the same thing in his edit of the first post.

Last edited by sahko; 09-27-2010 at 03:40 PM.
 
Old 09-27-2010, 03:48 PM   #6
mlpa
Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Aveiro
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 490

Rep: Reputation: 35
I think we should clarify, processors like Pentium Pro and Pentium II are i686.
So i468 and i586 is for processor older than these two.
 
Old 09-27-2010, 03:50 PM   #7
linus72
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Gordonsville-AKA Mayberry-Virginia
Distribution: PocketWriter/MinimalX
Posts: 5,058

Rep: Reputation: 330Reputation: 330Reputation: 330Reputation: 330
I run -current, both i686 and x86_64 on same PC
K8 amd athlon64 3300+ 2.4ghz

I also have a K7 amd athlonXP 2400+ 1.8ghz which runs -current

EDIT
OH!
the differences on same machine betweenn i686 and x86_64
are

ram is somewhat higher on x86_64, but it runs "smoother" and faster

also, the x86_64 is multilib with only firefox/flash 32bit pkgs

Last edited by linus72; 09-27-2010 at 03:56 PM.
 
Old 09-27-2010, 04:13 PM   #8
piratesmack
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Distribution: Slackware, Arch
Posts: 518

Rep: Reputation: 133Reputation: 133
i686 here (Intel Atom N270)
 
Old 09-27-2010, 04:23 PM   #9
raconteur
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2007
Location: Slightly left of center
Distribution: slackware
Posts: 276
Blog Entries: 2

Rep: Reputation: 44
In the poll I specified i586 and i686, but I do still have a fully functional slackware firewall on i486 - out of service but idle and fully functional. Would I rely on i486 support in future versions? Probably not. I do have some serviceable antiques that I would mess about with using antique slackware, but nothing I would put newer versions on.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-27-2010, 04:24 PM   #10
mlpa
Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Aveiro
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 490

Rep: Reputation: 35
I use Slackware 13.1 in a Pentium 4, so i686.
And in my laptop I use Slackware64 13.1 so x86_64.

I thought that no one would vote i486, but look I'm wrong.

The people who vote i486 and i586 can tell what version of Slackware use and what processor have?

If you are using a old version of Slackware, it's possible that you never install the newer version in that machine.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-27-2010, 04:54 PM   #11
GrapefruiTgirl
Guru
 
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594

Rep: Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550Reputation: 550
x86_64, i686

I run Slack64-current on my desktop machine (Core2).

I selected i686 also because I have my 300MHz PII Klamath firewall machine here with Slackware 11.0 on it, and still fire it up sometimes. That's the funny CPU in the big plug-in cartridge. LOL @ introductory price of $1981.00 in 1997!!
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-27-2010, 05:02 PM   #12
Wed
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Sweden
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 147

Rep: Reputation: 26
I have a bunch of 486 boxes. I don't use them, I didn't vote for 486 and they don't have Slackware. But I can't get rid of them. What appeals to me with those machines is that they don't require active cooling. They could do service as thin clients, as long as I don't need heavy duty graphics. But my main machine could do that as well as pull it's own weight.
 
Old 09-27-2010, 05:10 PM   #13
astrogeek
Senior Member
 
Registered: Oct 2008
Distribution: Slackware: 12.1, 13.1, 14.1, 64-14.1, -current, FreeBSD-10
Posts: 1,776

Rep: Reputation: 603Reputation: 603Reputation: 603Reputation: 603Reputation: 603Reputation: 603
I still run old hw, but not with new OS

For purposes of this poll - 586/686/64.

I have Slackware 12.1 running on a couple of Pentiums (Pentium 120mhz, Pentium MMX 300mhz). Although not in daily use any more.

But for long life and usefulness...

I still run 4 old notebooks, Pentium 120mhz.64MB RAM, but they have Mandrake 7.2 and will never be "upgraded". FWIW, I still maintain my own package repository for those and get frequent use out of them, mostly as rapid development custom data acquisition platforms. I can quickly write a serial or parallel driver for special applications, capture and/or control a remote process via the internet.

So it is nice to have been able to extend those beyond the breaking point. In general, I say support everything until there is a clear reason not to, whatever that reason may ultimately be - someone will benefit from it.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 09-27-2010, 05:14 PM   #14
55020
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Yorks. W.R. 167397
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 355
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: Reputation: 315Reputation: 315Reputation: 315Reputation: 315
Code:
elsie# uname -a
Linux elsie 2.6.34 #2 Sun Jun 13 11:57:11 BST 2010 i586 AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
elsie# cat /etc/slackware-version 
Slackware 13.1.0
 
Old 09-27-2010, 05:48 PM   #15
dive
Senior Member
 
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,211

Rep: Reputation: 292Reputation: 292Reputation: 292
Quote:
Originally Posted by 55020 View Post
Code:
elsie# uname -a
Linux elsie 2.6.34 #2 Sun Jun 13 11:57:11 BST 2010 i586 AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux
elsie# cat /etc/slackware-version 
Slackware 13.1.0
haha nice
 
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
what is 'architecture' in 'binary for an architecture'?multiple architecture support? wagaboy Linux - Newbie 2 07-10-2010 11:18 AM
Proposed Hardware for HA-NAS Server on Slackware Linux zordrak Linux - Hardware 4 07-06-2009 10:49 AM
openSUSE 11.1 i586 on i686 Architecture tak.rliu Suse/Novell 1 01-29-2009 12:47 PM
Whats the best way to switch IP Addresses between servers in a redundant architecture helptonewbie Linux - Newbie 2 08-26-2008 12:14 PM
i686 vs i386 instruction architecture Earth Linux - Newbie 1 06-08-2005 09:18 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 PM.

Main Menu
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration