Website tells users to switch to Slackware in protest of systemd
SlackwareThis Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
Notices
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
Get a virtual cloud desktop with the Linux distro that you want in less than five minutes with Shells! With over 10 pre-installed distros to choose from, the worry-free installation life is here! Whether you are a digital nomad or just looking for flexibility, Shells can put your Linux machine on the device that you want to use.
Exclusive for LQ members, get up to 45% off per month. Click here for more info.
I actually can't see what would be wrong with that
Yeah, what could possibly be wrong with replacing everything with inferior reinvented wheels?
Without looking at the code I can already say that this thing is broken and doesn't work right.
So... that means both ntpd and time just got deprecated... at least they're now wholly focused on trying to deprecate the entire GNU operating system outright rather than just bits and pieces of GNU/Linux.
They should just fork the kernel already and create their own OS. At least GNU/Linux would still be GNU/Linux.
No their not sick; just completely perpetually misguided in the fact that they know what's best for everyone regardless if only they understand it, and everyone else is just stupid and shouldn't question them.
Don't worry Moisespedro, we can keep just about every piece of sane software out there alive through patches and project forks. We got HALd to build on kernel 3.14.4 now didn't we? Shouldn't be too hard to get anything else dusted off and working again with some effort and elbow grease.
SNTP is intended for primary servers equipped with a single reference clock, as well as for clients with a single upstream server and no dependent clients.
I'll admit that my NTPD server is consuming an ENTIRE MEGABYTE of memory (RSS) on my desktop machine. Why, that's what the dbus-daemon consumes!
I can't believe that I tolerate such waste.
Last edited by Richard Cranium; 05-29-2014 at 07:52 PM.
Reason: Boys and girls, that's called "sarcasm".
So... that means both ntpd and time just got deprecated... at least they're now wholly focused on trying to deprecate the entire GNU operating system outright rather than just bits and pieces of GNU/Linux.
They should just fork the kernel already and create their own OS. At least GNU/Linux would still be GNU/Linux.
Did you even read the release notes? systemd-timesync is not a NTP server, it is merely a SNTP client, similar to the ntpdate command. Nothing is deprecated here. Please don't spread FUD, but actually read the available documentation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Cranium
You are going to have to explain that one.
On ssystems without real time clock, like many embedded systems, it makes sense to have a service that sets the time correctly, so that you have actual timestamps in your logs, instead of for example milliseconds from boot. Since the systemd suite contains a logger a SNTP client is IMHO a valuable addition.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Cranium
Accepting the code without even looking at it does nothing more than disqualifying you from any reasonable discussion.
Would only be fun if I had made a statement about the code quality, but I have only made statements about the general decision to add something like that to the systemd suite. I have not, I have merely pointed out that spouting "It is broken and doesn't work right, I don't have to look!" is a different thing, I would think.
I won't comment on your last post, it is a waste of time.
On ssystems without real time clock, like many embedded systems, it makes sense to have a service that sets the time correctly, so that you have actual timestamps in your logs, instead of for example milliseconds from boot. Since the systemd suite contains a logger a SNTP client is IMHO a valuable addition.
Right.
Now, if you were discussing embedded systems from, oh, the 1980's, then the size of the NTPD server would be a sticking point. (A whole megabyte when even a fully tricked out system might have only 64K.)
But now we are in the 21st century. ntpdate (not statically linked, so this size is too small) is ~95Kb. Any systemd embedded system will have some type of cron, won't it? So just run ntpdate on a cron job and be done with it versus creating a new specialized client.
Somehow I'm not surprised that systemd contains its very own logger. How special.
You are obviously highly technically proficient as you run Gentoo. However, as a Moderator it perhaps might be better if you dealt with violations of forum rules rather than engage in urination contests. I do note that onebuck and unSpawn are a bit more detached. Just a suggestion.
You are obviously highly technically proficient as you run Gentoo. However, as a Moderator it perhaps might be better if you dealt with violations of forum rules rather than engage in urination contests. I do note that onebuck and unSpawn are a bit more detached. Just a suggestion.
So...as a moderator, he's not allowed to have an opinion that runs counter to other forum members? Detachment aside, he's merely defending his position, and in spite of some of the baiting, he's managed to keep his cool.
Tobi is the only one actually being resonable re: systemd. The naysayers are comically ignorant and keep spewing the same FUD that was going around a year ago.
So...as a moderator, he's not allowed to have an opinion that runs counter to other forum members? Detachment aside, he's merely defending his position, and in spite of some of the baiting, he's managed to keep his cool.
Indeed. He has conducted himself very well in the debate. Again, my thoughts are suggestions, I don't want to tell anyone how to post. However, the position of Moderator does come with the responsibility of deescalating a thread if it heats up.
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.