Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
02-03-2013, 10:34 AM
|
#1
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Providence, Moka Mauritius
Distribution: Slackware, OpenSuse, Debian, Fedora, Mageia, Ubuntu, RedHat, BSD, Gentoo, Puppy
Posts: 146
Rep:
|
Use 32-bit Slackware? Post here to let the developers know!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob
(nobody uses 32-bit Slackware anymore?)
Eric
|
I'm still using 32-bit as well as 64-bit.
By the way 32-bit Slackware was the only distro I could install on a friend's old laptop . Others does not support that cpu.
|
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 10:38 AM
|
#2
|
|
Slackware Contributor
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,677
Rep: 
|
Coincidentally, we discussed this topic internally, this week. The general consensus was that 32-bit Slackware is not yet going away.
Eric
|
|
|
4 members found this post helpful.
|
02-03-2013, 10:53 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Prince Rupert, B.C., Canada
Distribution: Slackware, OpenBSD
Posts: 3,642
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob
The general consensus was that 32-bit Slackware is not yet going away.
Eric
|
Thank you! Most of my hardware is 64 bit capable, but I do have an older Acer netbook. 
|
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 01:08 PM
|
#4
|
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Laptop: Slackware 14.0 // Desktop: Slackware64 14.0 // Netbook: Slackware 14.0
Posts: 6,176
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob
Coincidentally, we discussed this topic internally, this week. The general consensus was that 32-bit Slackware is not yet going away.
Eric
|
Good. My netbook has a 32-bit only CPU, and my laptop has a 64-bit CPU but only 2GB RAM, so I don't believe it would do justice to a 64-bit OS. I'd like to squeeze a few more years out of them yet. 
|
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 02:05 PM
|
#5
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2008
Distribution: Slackware: 12.1, 13.0, 13.1, 13.37, 64-14
Posts: 675
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob
Coincidentally, we discussed this topic internally, this week. The general consensus was that 32-bit Slackware is not yet going away.
Eric
|
Yes thanks! It had not yet crossed my mind that 32 bit would some day go away!
Of 8 systems in the room with me at the moment, only 2 recent additions are 64 bit. Of the other 6, 3 have been updated to Slackware 14, the others are Slackware 12, and I expect them to continue in service for a very long time!
Who still runs 32 bit? I do!
Last edited by astrogeek; 02-03-2013 at 02:06 PM.
|
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 02:26 PM
|
#6
|
|
Slackware Contributor
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,677
Rep: 
|
The problem is: when we asked who still uses 32-bit Slackware the silence was deafening. Now that I talk about possible farewell to 32-bit Slackware everybody starts telling they still use 32-bit Slackware.
People if you still need it, you need to make yourself heard when we ask for your opinions!
Eric
|
|
|
3 members found this post helpful.
|
02-03-2013, 02:35 PM
|
#7
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2008
Distribution: Slackware: 12.1, 13.0, 13.1, 13.37, 64-14
Posts: 675
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob
The problem is: when we asked who still uses 32-bit Slackware the silence was deafening. Now that I talk about possible farewell to 32-bit Slackware everybody starts telling they still use 32-bit Slackware.
|
Sorry, I must have missed the question until now...
Thanks for having asked, I'll turn up the attentiveness and volume in future!
|
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 02:38 PM
|
#8
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: Klaipėda, Lithuania
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 228
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob
People if you still need it, you need to make yourself heard when we ask for your opinions!
|
32-bit Slackware is still useful on a small VPS (up to 2GB RAM), I do have one from Linode (512MB RAM).
|
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 03:10 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slackware-14.0 on a Lenovo T61 6457-4XG
Posts: 2,779
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob
The problem is: when we asked who still uses 32-bit Slackware the silence was deafening. Now that I talk about possible farewell to 32-bit Slackware everybody starts telling they still use 32-bit Slackware.
People if you still need it, you need to make yourself heard when we ask for your opinions!
Eric
|
I must admit I didn't see the thread asking that question. In fact, I still can't locate it with the "search" feature (maybe i need new glasses?).
I already noticed that this kind of question often do not receive as many spot-on answers as I would have expected, maybe because most people visiting this forum are mostly looking for help or just trying to see if they can help someone.
For instance out of the 46 posts following the question "is support for non-SMP i486 kernel still needed", not that many were elaborated answers IMO.
Maybe this kind of question would deserve to be "stickyed" till a conclusion be drawn by the Slackware team, or could be asked in a specific forum about "the future of Slackware", or in a low-traffic mailing-list with the same scope?
Last edited by Didier Spaier; 02-03-2013 at 03:13 PM.
Reason: typos corrected
|
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 03:24 PM
|
#10
|
|
Slackware Contributor
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 4,677
Rep: 
|
https://twitter.com/volkerdi/status/6248881507 - note that this was 3 years ago, and never got a meaningful reaction :-)
But as long as at least one person in the Slackware team uses old computers or netbooks, I guess there will be a 32-bit Slackware.
I had to create a 32-bit Slackware virtual machine this weekend, in order to run a half-life dedicated server... proprietary 32-bit software will not go away for a long time either.
Eric
|
|
|
|
02-03-2013, 03:45 PM
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slackware-14.0 on a Lenovo T61 6457-4XG
Posts: 2,779
|
<rant>Are we supposed to know that such questions are asked on Twitter?</rant>
Thanks for the info anyway, Eric. I am now a Pat's follower, though I generally avoid this kind of (so called) "social" network :^)
|
|
|
4 members found this post helpful.
|
02-03-2013, 03:50 PM
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: May 2008
Posts: 2,839
|
Couldn't help but think of this:
Quote:
"But Mr Dent, the plans have been available in the local planning office for the last nine months."
"Oh yes, well as soon as I heard I went straight round to see them, yesterday afternoon. You hadn't exactly gone out of your way to call attention to them, had you? I mean, like actually telling anybody or anything."
"But the plans were on display ..."
"On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them."
"That's the display department."
"With a flashlight."
"Ah, well the lights had probably gone."
"So had the stairs."
"But look, you found the notice didn't you?"
"Yes," said Arthur, "yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of the Leopard'."
|
|
|
|
8 members found this post helpful.
|
02-03-2013, 03:50 PM
|
#13
|
|
LQ 5k Club
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Oldham, Lancs, England
Distribution: Laptop: Slackware 14.0 // Desktop: Slackware64 14.0 // Netbook: Slackware 14.0
Posts: 6,176
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alien Bob
|
It's not about abandoning 32-bit altogether, though, is it?
|
|
|
1 members found this post helpful.
|
02-03-2013, 04:14 PM
|
#14
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2008
Distribution: Slackware: 12.1, 13.0, 13.1, 13.37, 64-14
Posts: 675
Rep: 
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Didier Spaier
Maybe this kind of question would deserve to be "stickyed" till a conclusion be drawn by the Slackware team, or could be asked in a specific forum about "the future of Slackware", or in a low-traffic mailing-list with the same scope?
|
I have to agree.
I do not tweet, twitter, facebook or participate in other so-called social media (although I do sometimes twitch... but that is another matter).
Sad as it may seem to some, my participation in this forum is pretty much the extent of my on-line socializing (and I must add it is generally a very good social circle at that!).
A sticky here would do more for visibility than anything else, at least for myself and any others like me.
One other useful place to post such questions might be in a well known README like CHANGES_AND_HINTS.txt - maybe FEEDBACK.txt, updated as necessary in -current. Those who have learned the value of Slackware generally, and the online documents and release notes in particular, would quickly learn to check FEEDBACK.txt or whatever for such concerns.
|
|
|
3 members found this post helpful.
|
02-03-2013, 05:32 PM
|
#15
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2002
Location: Coal Township PA
Distribution: Slackware64-14.0 (3.9.2) UEFI enabled
Posts: 281
Rep:
|
32 Bit just saved my butt
On Saturday I went to upgrade the UEFI firmware on my AsRock Z77 Extreme motherboard. It hung at "Processing Crashless....". How ironic. Anyway I need a new bios chip,I am waiting for a response to my email I sent to AsRock.
Back to the point under my desk was an old Pentium 4 system. Slackware14.0 32 bit loaded and runs although a little slow.
Because I have an external USB backup drive I only lost about 2 hours of work. Good thing because the church's treasurers report is due Monday evening.
Just my two cents.
John
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|