LinuxQuestions.org
Review your favorite Linux distribution.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 04-28-2011, 04:36 AM   #1
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,289

Rep: Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322
updates, multilib, ATI drivers & versions


Just successfully gone to 13.37 on a 64 & 32 bit box, and my question concerns the 64 bit. Beyond 13.37 it has later versions of pixman, libdrm, and Mesa (with llvm support which slack normally doesn't) along with llvm-2.9. I have been advised to do this because of my unusually crap ati GPU doesn't do vertex shading or summat.

I use wine (not video intensive stuff). Will I get away with 32 bit multilib versions that are different? Here's a list of the stuff in question.

mesa-7.9.2 (w/o llvm support) NOW 7.10.1 with llvm support
libdrm 2.4.23 NOW 2.4.25
pixman 0.20.6(?) NOW 0.21.8
xf86-video-ati - no change
xorg-server - no change.
llvm-2.9 compiled 64bit from source.

llvm is some on the fly compiler http://www.llvm.org
I'd welcome your thoughts. Ultimately it will blow up in my face, but I'm used to that :-/.
 
Old 04-28-2011, 06:25 AM   #2
Alien Bob
Slackware Contributor
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 8,559

Rep: Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106Reputation: 8106
Things won't blow up.

The versions of 64bit and their 32-bit "compat32" counterparts do not have to match. Consider the 32-bit library layer as a separate independent entity. Those 32-bit libraries do have to be compatible with the C libraries (glibc) that were installed with Slackware - meaning that some old 32-bit libraries may have issues.

Eric
 
Old 04-29-2011, 03:08 AM   #3
business_kid
LQ Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Ireland
Distribution: Slackware, Slarm64 & Android
Posts: 16,289

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322Reputation: 2322
That's lovely, thanks. So I can just slap in the latest compat32.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[SOLVED] how to install ati proprietary drivers on fedora 9 without updates luke9511 Linux - Hardware 7 07-02-2009 09:31 PM
Re-install Kubuntu 8.10 without losing updates or disactivate/remove drivers&software 2ndchance Linux - Newbie 4 04-05-2009 12:20 AM
ATI 9600Pro & ATI Proprietary Drivers problem Hyakutake Slackware 6 12-04-2005 10:08 AM
New ATI drivers & tv apps agalias Linux - Software 3 10-22-2003 03:21 PM
ATI Drivers & Safeguarding zuele Linux - Hardware 0 10-06-2003 06:39 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 AM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration