LinuxQuestions.org
Did you know LQ has a Linux Hardware Compatibility List?
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Search this Thread
Old 04-30-2006, 05:44 PM   #31
liquidtenmilion
Member
 
Registered: May 2004
Location: South Carolina
Distribution: Slackware 11.0
Posts: 606

Rep: Reputation: 31

200k to a kernel does not matter.... Especially when it is going to be a module...


XFS is not so great though. I've used it and it chokes up extensively on small files (less than 4MB or so) when compared to reiserfs or even ext3. But on large files it is very fast(But has VERY high cpu usage compared to the others, and JFS is faster anyway on large files)

Reiserfs is still a good default for a desktop system, and JFS for a server.
 
Old 04-30-2006, 05:46 PM   #32
Penguin of Wonder
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: West Virginia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,249

Rep: Reputation: 45
Don't get confused guys, JFFS and JFFS2 have been around since 2.4 kernels. JFS and JFFS are not the same thing.
http://sourceware.org/jffs2/

Last edited by Penguin of Wonder; 04-30-2006 at 05:47 PM.
 
Old 04-30-2006, 06:36 PM   #33
Old_Fogie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,515

Rep: Reputation: 62
No one can upgrade to version 11.0 until I get fully up and running on slack 10.2 OKAY

I just came to slackware w/in past few weeks. I'm almost done...so don't leave me ...I need to get modem and fax going then you guys are allowed to upgrade.

What's weird is linuxpackages says they are taking pre-orders for it, but no release date.

I like Pat's ways of KISS, and stability b4 latest/greatest. Then again I dont own the latest/greatest so I am biased.

Hahhaa, ps my vote:

-open office out..it changes too much and ken zalewski at linuxpackages does nice job for me
-i use ext2 still, i'm afraid to do the ram disk stuff yet..and all that initrd stuff.
-yes keep kernels small i have old pc's and new and slack on all of em. 1 distro for many pc's woo hoo

Last edited by Old_Fogie; 06-09-2006 at 04:05 PM.
 
Old 04-30-2006, 08:33 PM   #34
drumz
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 188

Rep: Reputation: 33
amaroK is in current, and k3b is in extra/, and has been for a while.
 
Old 04-30-2006, 09:07 PM   #35
Penguin of Wonder
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: West Virginia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,249

Rep: Reputation: 45
There's no reason to keep using ext2 except for your /boot. Switching to ext3 or reiserfs will only increase your performance. If your hardware is older though, ext3 might be better than reiser.
 
Old 05-01-2006, 12:42 AM   #36
Old_Fogie
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2006
Distribution: SLACKWARE 4TW! =D
Posts: 1,515

Rep: Reputation: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by drumz
amaroK is in current,
Really? OK. It wasnt on my k-menu in KDE. Then again, neither was "ktorrent" or "kappfinder" either tho. Good to know thanks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Penguin of Wonder
There's no reason to keep using ext2 except for your /boot. Switching to ext3 or reiserfs will only increase your performance. If your hardware is older though, ext3 might be better than reiser.
Oh ok. I'll try it out on one of my pc's that I dont care if I mess up. I really went with ext2 because when I first tried out Linux by live cd's from vector, mepis, and debian amongst others, many of them had said older pc's would have better performance with ext2, more tried and true one of them distro's called it. But your right I should get with the times.
 
Old 05-01-2006, 08:17 AM   #37
tangle
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Smithville, TN
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,745

Rep: Reputation: 71
Slackware does include 2.6.x kernel and xfs/jfs support.

If you choose to boot with the test26.s kernel when installing Slackware 10.2. You can choose to format your HD with ext2, ext3, reiserfs, xfs or jfs. You can also choose that kernel for your boot kernel too. When you boot for the first time you will see a lot of can't find modules, just install the kernel modules for 2.6.13 on the second cd, then reboot.
 
Old 05-01-2006, 08:37 AM   #38
peter_89
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2006
Distribution: Microsoft Windows XP Professional SP2; Slackware Linux 10.2
Posts: 215

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally Posted by tangle
Slackware does include 2.6.x kernel
Yes, but it usually doesn't work.
 
Old 05-01-2006, 08:56 AM   #39
tangle
Senior Member
 
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Smithville, TN
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 1,745

Rep: Reputation: 71
I have installed with the 2.6 kernel about 6 times and it have worked everytime.
 
Old 05-01-2006, 09:19 AM   #40
egag
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 2,721

Rep: Reputation: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by peter_89
Yes, but it usually doesn't work.
sounds like you've got a lot of experience with that.
did you inform the kernel-team that they are on the wrong track ?

I use 2.6 kernels since 2.6.4 and didn't see much problems.

egag
 
Old 05-01-2006, 10:12 AM   #41
paulsiu
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 143

Rep: Reputation: 15
A few general questions:

1. How often is Slackware released? Is it updated roughly every 6 months or when the team feels like it?

2. How many people is actually on the Slackware team? Does Patrick Volkerding do all the work himself? I was told that Slackware was a one-man show, I was wondering if the statement was literal?
 
Old 05-01-2006, 10:27 AM   #42
merchtemeagle
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 512

Rep: Reputation: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penguin of Wonder
There's no reason to keep using ext2 except for your /boot. Switching to ext3 or reiserfs will only increase your performance. If your hardware is older though, ext3 might be better than reiser.
Wherefore should /boot be ext2 ?
 
Old 05-01-2006, 10:44 AM   #43
Penguin of Wonder
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: West Virginia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,249

Rep: Reputation: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by merchtemeagle
Wherefore should /boot be ext2 ?
I love the way you phrased that
You generally make /boot ext2 because there are so few files on it. ext3, XFS, JFS, etc. are all journaling file systems and are built to handle a large number of files. ext2 is not a journaling system so it works very well with a small number of files. ext2 is also old, tested, and well proven. You can use ext3, XFS, etc. on your /boot if you wish, but its overkill really.
 
Old 05-01-2006, 11:20 AM   #44
merchtemeagle
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Belgium
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 512

Rep: Reputation: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Penguin of Wonder
I love the way you phrased that
Is it wrong? Since English is not my mother tongue, I can but learn.
 
Old 05-01-2006, 11:27 AM   #45
Penguin of Wonder
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: West Virginia
Distribution: Gentoo
Posts: 1,249

Rep: Reputation: 45
Know, actually thats very right. Its just thats a odd way to phrase it. Sounds more like 16th century english than modern. In the U.S. we rarely use the word "wherefore." I'm sure you've learned British english in school though, so that probably explains it.

Last edited by Penguin of Wonder; 05-01-2006 at 11:31 AM.
 
  


Closed Thread

Tags
advice, chat, far, general, upgrade


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slack 10.2 slack 10.2 ran xserver after all on sata with via board devafree LinuxQuestions.org Member Success Stories 5 05-31-2006 12:54 AM
Frozen-Bubble(from slack 8.2) Not Running in slack 9 bongski55 Slackware 8 01-02-2006 05:10 PM
Slack 10.1 will a Slack 10 Wine pkg work? acummings Slackware 1 03-25-2005 05:55 AM
Using Slack 10's 2.6.7 kernel packages on Slack 10.1? SocialEngineer Slackware 1 03-05-2005 12:53 PM
cd rom error on installation media (With both slack 9,1 and slack 10) busbarn Slackware - Installation 6 07-15-2004 04:03 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration