Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.
|
| Notices |
Welcome to LinuxQuestions.org, a friendly and active Linux Community.
You are currently viewing LQ as a guest. By joining our community you will have the ability to post topics, receive our newsletter, use the advanced search, subscribe to threads and access many other special features. Registration is quick, simple and absolutely free. Join our community today!
Note that registered members see fewer ads, and ContentLink is completely disabled once you log in.
Are you new to LinuxQuestions.org? Visit the following links:
Site Howto |
Site FAQ |
Sitemap |
Register Now
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. If you need to reset your password, click here.
Having a problem logging in? Please visit this page to clear all LQ-related cookies.
 |
GNU/Linux Basic Guide
This 255-page guide will provide you with the keys to understand the philosophy of free software, teach you how to use and handle it, and give you the tools required to move easily in the world of GNU/Linux. Many users and administrators will be taking their first steps with this GNU/Linux Basic guide and it will show you how to approach and solve the problems you encounter.
Click Here to receive this Complete Guide absolutely free. |
|
 |
|
06-20-2009, 05:42 AM
|
#31
|
|
Member
Registered: May 2008
Distribution: Slackware 13
Posts: 116
Rep:
|
It has come to my attention that the almighty Bob wants 13.0 to have the 2.8 kernel, written in LOLcode. So it's my bet, Slackware 13.0 will never come out.
The next version will be called differently, and be released in the foreseeable future. But since the question was specifically aimed at #13 (rather than the more generic 'next release'), I shall claim the price when the next version is not number 13.0.
It's a long shot, but it's a bet I'm willing to take.
KTHNXBYE
|
|
|
|
06-20-2009, 06:10 AM
|
#32
|
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: London
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 5,113
|
31 of June 
|
|
|
|
06-20-2009, 04:36 PM
|
#33
|
|
Guru
Registered: Dec 2006
Location: underground
Distribution: Slackware64
Posts: 7,594
|
September 05, 2009
|
|
|
|
06-20-2009, 11:42 PM
|
#34
|
|
LQ Newbie
Registered: Jul 2006
Posts: 19
Rep:
|
Aug 27, 2009
|
|
|
|
06-21-2009, 01:06 AM
|
#35
|
|
Member
Registered: Jun 2009
Distribution: Slackware 12.2/13.1
Posts: 41
Rep:
|
August 10, 2009
|
|
|
|
06-21-2009, 08:08 AM
|
#36
|
|
Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Spijkenisse, Netherlands
Posts: 116
Rep:
|
July 30th (2009)
|
|
|
|
06-21-2009, 08:20 AM
|
#37
|
|
Member
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Everett
Distribution: Slackware 13.37
Posts: 785
Rep:
|
02 October 2009
|
|
|
|
06-21-2009, 09:02 AM
|
#38
|
|
Member
Registered: Oct 2007
Distribution: Slackware current
Posts: 136
Rep:
|
July 22.
|
|
|
|
06-21-2009, 03:06 PM
|
#39
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,084
|
The next slack will slackware XP
|
|
|
|
06-21-2009, 03:28 PM
|
#40
|
|
Member
Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Switzerland
Distribution: Linux Mint 11, Knoppix 6.7
Posts: 141
Rep:
|
August 15th.
|
|
|
|
06-21-2009, 04:28 PM
|
#41
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,003
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dive
The next slack will slackware XP
|
Well, as long as it's not called Slackware Vista...
My first Slackware was "Slackware 96" 
|
|
|
|
06-21-2009, 05:04 PM
|
#42
|
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: London
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 5,113
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by niels.horn
Well, as long as it's not called Slackware Vista...
My first Slackware was "Slackware 96" 
|
What about Slackware Longhorn? (In a perverse way, I like this name  )
Have you guys noticed? The only distro that has 'silly' threads is slackware. I've been using fedora/centos and debian for the last 4 years, I installed slackware in march this year, and you know what - it works. although slackware is said to be more difficult to set up, I had fewer problems with it than with fedora/debian/centos, etc. Initially I really didn't like the elitist attitiude towards slack (for fax ache - linux is linux), but now I can see why people like slackware (still don't like people who think that they are superior because they use slackware). It's faster than most distros and it JUST WORKS. I've been a happy slackware user for the last 3 months and I rarely boot into other distros - I suspect there're cobwebs there 
Last edited by sycamorex; 06-21-2009 at 05:06 PM.
|
|
|
|
06-21-2009, 05:20 PM
|
#43
|
|
Member
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: Diessen, The Netherlands
Distribution: Slackware 14 x86_64
Posts: 652
Rep:
|
Slackware 7? 
|
|
|
|
06-21-2009, 05:31 PM
|
#44
|
|
Senior Member
Registered: Mar 2007
Location: Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 1,003
Rep:
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adriv
Slackware 7? 
|
No.... We're way ahead of that! 
|
|
|
|
06-21-2009, 05:38 PM
|
#45
|
|
LQ Veteran
Registered: Nov 2005
Location: London
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 5,113
|
I haven't checked it, but there hasn't probably been slackware 3.11
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 AM.
|
|
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing
Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute
content, let us know.
|
Latest Threads
LQ News
|
|