LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-09-2011, 06:28 PM   #1
mlpa
Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Aveiro
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 542

Rep: Reputation: 50
TeTeX Time for update?


Hi, I use Slackware from version 12.0
When i have two write something more formal the choice is always Latex.
But as we all know the TEX version presented in Slackware is no longer supported (since 2009), I produce some report that used algorithmic package and in Windows generates correctly (last TexLive) but in Slackware64 13.34 give error because don't understand some macros.

We all know that the tex version is outdated, and TexLive may be too big, but I'm starting this thread so we could find a solution.

For example MiKTeX can be a suitable substitute?

Maybe in next Slackware other Tex package can be available
 
Old 06-09-2011, 07:17 PM   #2
qweasd
Member
 
Registered: May 2010
Posts: 621

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
Making TexLive from source is a really straightforward, if somewhat lengthy process. And there is already a Slackbuild for it. I would vote to simply remove teTex, so that installing TexLive takes one less step. I use TeX for a living, but let's face it, it's clearly a niche application, and I bet a whole lot more people, if forced to make a choice, would rather see LibreOffice on an official DVD.
 
Old 06-10-2011, 01:03 AM   #3
tramni1980
Member
 
Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Köln, Germany
Distribution: Slackware64-14.2 & -current, DragonFly BSD, OpenBSD
Posts: 819

Rep: Reputation: 55
I also use LaTeX extensively for my job. Unfortunately texlive is too big a distribution to ship with Slackware. I simply build it using the slackbuild script in slackbuilds.org.
 
Old 06-10-2011, 04:32 AM   #4
mlpa
Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Aveiro
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 542

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 50
I agreed with qweasd, if the package is not maintain is better just remove it and let the users install it's own Tex of choice.
Shipping a dead project don't help much and it's consuming space that other features could need.
 
Old 06-10-2011, 08:20 AM   #5
allend
LQ 5k Club
 
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Melbourne
Distribution: Slackware64-15.0
Posts: 6,371

Rep: Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748Reputation: 2748
Quote:
Shipping a dead project don't help much and it's consuming space that other features could need.
There is an older thread that discusses the TeTex vs TexLive issue. http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi...ckware-635217/
Pat Volkerding is quoted there as saying
Quote:
Besides, I thought one of the design goals of TeX was to create a typesetting system that would not become obsolete -- how functionally obsolete is it?
The point is the project may not be undergoing further development, but it is still very usable in the shipped form, due to being designed for longevity. It is a shining testament to the work of Donald Knuth. I make use of it in providing PDF document printing facilities to my network users. It performs just fine for this purpose and I have no need to to pursue the much more resource hungry TexLive.
TexLive is a much more difficult project to bring into Slackware as it provides its own package management facilities that would be difficult to accommodate in Slackware. If you want and need TexLive then you can install it for yourself. Including TexLive would consume far more space than TeTex. TBH, I find calling for the replacement of TeTex with TexLive in Slackware, just because you cannot run a few macros and are too lazy to build your own TexLive, to lack consideration of other Slackware users.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 06-10-2011, 10:07 AM   #6
malkavian
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Jan 2011
Distribution: Debian
Posts: 17

Rep: Reputation: 3
Does TeXLive provide any functionality that teTeX doesn't? Anyway teTeX still works for me
 
Old 06-10-2011, 10:13 AM   #7
mlpa
Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Aveiro
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 542

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 50
I install TexLive, and i haven't ask for TexLive in slackware, simply said If TeTex is not supported, and maybe multiple users uninstall and install TexLive, why not remove TeTex and use that space for other features.

Then each user is free to install TeTex or TexLive or other thing. Of course this is only my point of view.
 
Old 06-10-2011, 01:46 PM   #8
Ilgar
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Istanbul, Turkey
Distribution: Slackware64 15.0, Slackwarearm 14.2
Posts: 1,157

Rep: Reputation: 237Reputation: 237Reputation: 237
I also agree that TeTeX works quite well (I'm a mathematician btw.). For some unusual styles and symbols you might need the newer packages in TeXlive but otherwise the TeTeX version that ships with Slackware is sufficient. I do not object to TeXlive itself but it really is too large to be included in the installation CD/DVD.
 
Old 06-10-2011, 02:54 PM   #9
tuxrules
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 1,158

Rep: Reputation: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by allend View Post
I make use of it in providing PDF document printing facilities to my network users.
Personally I've never used TeTex or TexLive but this line piqued my curiosity. Care to elaborate on this little gem

Thanks,
 
Old 06-10-2011, 03:26 PM   #10
Dinithion
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2007
Location: Norway
Distribution: Slackware 14.1
Posts: 446

Rep: Reputation: 59
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuxrules View Post
Personally I've never used TeTex or TexLive but this line piqued my curiosity. Care to elaborate on this little gem

Thanks,
It's a package that are used to convert .tex files to postscripts, dvi or pdf files. LaTeX is a way of writing documents/articles/books. It isn't wysiwyg, but it is still extremely efficient. I think I have two or three math/physics books where there some place in the preface says "This book was written using LaTeX".

Mathematicians, or physicists like using latex because its easy to write formulas. It's also very consistent in behavior. I find it a real PITA to write documents in Openoffice, because if you make one little change in the top of the document, you will have ripple effects all the way down. This isn't so much so in LaTeX.

Also, you can have LaTeX take care of citation, page numbering, titles, subtitles, Content list etc. It's usually done quite neatly.
 
Old 06-10-2011, 04:16 PM   #11
qweasd
Member
 
Registered: May 2010
Posts: 621

Rep: Reputation: Disabled
allend:
Quote:
The point is the project may not be undergoing further development, but it is still very usable in the shipped form, due to being designed for longevity. It is a shining testament to the work of Donald Knuth. I make use of it in providing PDF document printing facilities to my network users. It performs just fine for this purpose and I have no need to to pursue the much more resource hungry TexLive.
Ilgar:
Quote:
I also agree that TeTeX works quite well (I'm a mathematician btw.). For some unusual styles and symbols you might need the newer packages in TeXlive but otherwise the TeTeX version that ships with Slackware is sufficient.
You guys make a lot of sense, so let me just scale back a bit what I said earlier. teTeX is indeed a great package as it is, and I see no compelling reason to remove it. I actually use it now, if only because I don't feel like making TeXLive. I also use the latter with Ubuntu, and, as far as I can tell, they are highly compatible. The only real beef I have with teTeX is the absence of Mathew Carter's Charter. That said, I personally wouldn't miss teTeX either. I prefer TeXLive, and I don't mind building it in one very very long step.
 
Old 06-10-2011, 04:51 PM   #12
mlpa
Member
 
Registered: May 2008
Location: Aveiro
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 542

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 50
From what i see TeTex is more than enough to the majority of slackware users.
I give a try to TexLive and it went very bad, if someone could help me follow this thread.

Thanks
 
Old 06-10-2011, 06:18 PM   #13
Gerard Lally
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2009
Location: Leinster, IE
Distribution: Slackware, NetBSD
Posts: 2,177

Rep: Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761Reputation: 1761
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuxrules View Post
Personally I've never used TeTex or TexLive but this line piqued my curiosity. Care to elaborate on this little gem

Thanks,
Some good reasons here to use LaTeX.

I use Texlive. I downloaded the ISO (quite big at 1.9GB), mounted it, and ran install-tl. Simple. And a well-configured Vim with a pleasant colour scheme (e.g., molokai) renders the writing process far more pleasant and productive than it ever was for me in any WYSIWYG word-processing program.

Needless to say, the output is vastly superior as well.

There is a good introduction to LaTeX here.

Last edited by Gerard Lally; 06-10-2011 at 06:21 PM.
 
Old 06-10-2011, 07:32 PM   #14
piotrdk
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Mar 2011
Posts: 4

Rep: Reputation: 0
Wink

Quote:
Does TeXLive provide any functionality that teTeX doesn't? Anyway teTeX still works for me
Yes. If you work on with languages that differ from English a lot, Chinese, for example, then TeTex is not sufficient.
I follow the pattern of some here, did not install TeTex from Slackware DVD, but went for TexLxlive provided in slackbuild. I am more then satisfied.
 
Old 06-10-2011, 07:42 PM   #15
bosth
Member
 
Registered: Apr 2011
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 304

Rep: Reputation: 127Reputation: 127
Quote:
Originally Posted by malkavian View Post
Does TeXLive provide any functionality that teTeX doesn't?
XeTeX only comes with TexLive I believe.
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why tetex? donallen Slackware 26 04-13-2010 10:39 AM
fonts-problem with tetex ruh31 Debian 0 03-31-2006 05:49 AM
teTeX Question duvalgo Linux - General 2 01-13-2006 04:19 PM
is tetex needed? speel Linux - Newbie 2 01-30-2005 06:24 AM
teTex nautilus_1987 Linux - General 8 09-19-2002 11:12 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:16 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration