LinuxQuestions.org
Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 02-17-2004, 10:18 PM   #16
subekk0
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, TX.
Distribution: Slacking since '94
Posts: 153

Rep: Reputation: 32

Quote:
Originally posted by Samsara
GRUB = <300K binary and config, 902K source.

Regards,

Samsara
Hey it only takes 1k over to make an extra CD
lilo 22.5.8 402K (complete) you also forgot to list the size of the dependencies for grub.
I am just set in my ways....
 
Old 02-17-2004, 10:37 PM   #17
subekk0
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, TX.
Distribution: Slacking since '94
Posts: 153

Rep: Reputation: 32
I just noticed that I have not put in a suggestion for 9.2 - Well I would like to see GNOME removed since it seems to be just taking up space. All of the Windowmanagers except *box and KDE. 9 of the 10 IRC applications, 5 of the 6 different email applications. 4 of the 5 text editors. Including Joes' personal EMACs compile. REMOVED. But if we did that we wuold have to call it Slackware 2.0. Just kidding.

What I would really like to see *xine* removed from the install and ogle replacing them.
AND
A STABLE VERSION OF WINE INTEGRATED INTO THE INSTALL SO THAT WHEN THE INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE YOU HAVE A WORKING WINE INSTALLATION.
I really get tired of answering WINE questions. Hey guys @ winehq . Sober up before writing the code and you will not have to rewrite it every 3 days. Or if you are sober get drunk before writing the code and you will not have to rewrite it every 3 days.

So anyway... as STABLE version of WINE integrated into the install or "optioned-in" and ogle.
 
Old 02-18-2004, 09:11 AM   #18
Samsara
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Distribution: Ubuntu, Mac OS X Tiger
Posts: 481

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally posted by subekk0
I just noticed that I have not put in a suggestion for 9.2 - Well I would like to see GNOME removed since it seems to be just taking up space. All of the Windowmanagers except *box and KDE. 9 of the 10 IRC applications, 5 of the 6 different email applications. 4 of the 5 text editors. Including Joes' personal EMACs compile. REMOVED. But if we did that we wuold have to call it Slackware 2.0. Just kidding.
Have you ever typed ps -A while running KDE? Can you tell what the processes are? Unix-like? I think not. And isn't Slackware supposed to be Unix-like? That is the one thing that bugs me about KDE, otherwise I think it's great. Not having proper processes is a major drawback, hence I use GNOME.

Quote:
A STABLE VERSION OF WINE INTEGRATED INTO THE INSTALL SO THAT WHEN THE INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE YOU HAVE A WORKING WINE INSTALLATION.
I really get tired of answering WINE questions. Hey guys @ winehq . Sober up before writing the code and you will not have to rewrite it every 3 days. Or if you are sober get drunk before writing the code and you will not have to rewrite it every 3 days.
If you're bent on blaming anyone, blame M$! I remember you saying you want to download iso images, i.e. from which I gather you don't buy boxed sets and probably don't donate, but you're cursing wine developers.

Regards,

Samsara
 
Old 02-18-2004, 09:15 AM   #19
Samsara
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Distribution: Ubuntu, Mac OS X Tiger
Posts: 481

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally posted by subekk0
Hey it only takes 1k over to make an extra CD
lilo 22.5.8 402K (complete) you also forgot to list the size of the dependencies for grub.
I am just set in my ways....
It depends on the size of your CD, right?

No exotic dependencies for grub that I know of, in fact:

>= sys-devel/autoconf - 2.5
>= sys-libs/ncurses - 5.2-r5

source:
http://www.gentoo-portage.com/browse...p?program=6002

See ya,

Samsara
 
Old 02-18-2004, 09:22 AM   #20
Astro
Member
 
Registered: Jan 2003
Location: Ballston Lake, NY
Distribution: Slackware, Debian
Posts: 665

Rep: Reputation: 30
Personally I've never once had a problem with LILO and plan to continue to use it even if if's pulled out of the distro like Enlightenment was.
 
Old 02-18-2004, 10:42 AM   #21
subekk0
Member
 
Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, TX.
Distribution: Slacking since '94
Posts: 153

Rep: Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally posted by Samsara
Have you ever typed ps -A while running KDE? Can you tell what the processes are? Unix-like? I think not. And isn't Slackware supposed to be Unix-like? That is the one thing that bugs me about KDE, otherwise I think it's great. Not having proper processes is a major drawback, hence I use GNOME.



If you're bent on blaming anyone, blame M$! I remember you saying you want to download iso images, i.e. from which I gather you don't buy boxed sets and probably don't donate, but you're cursing wine developers.

Regards,

Samsara
bash-2.05b# ps -A
PID TTY TIME CMD
1 ? 00:00:04 init
2 ? 00:00:00 keventd
3 ? 00:00:00 ksoftirqd_CPU0
4 ? 00:00:00 kswapd
5 ? 00:00:00 bdflush
6 ? 00:00:00 kupdated
10 ? 00:00:00 mdrecoveryd
11 ? 00:00:00 kjournald
27 ? 00:00:00 kjournald
28 ? 00:00:00 kjournald
29 ? 00:00:00 kjournald
30 ? 00:00:00 kjournald
31 ? 00:00:00 kjournald
48 ? 00:00:00 kapmd
70 ? 00:00:00 cardmgr
162 ? 00:00:00 knodemgrd_0
197 ? 00:00:00 khubd
1673 ? 00:00:00 syslogd
1676 ? 00:00:00 klogd
1679 ? 00:00:00 inetd
1682 ? 00:00:00 sshd
1710 ? 00:00:00 crond
1712 ? 00:00:00 atd
1716 ? 00:00:00 sendmail
1720 ? 00:00:00 apmd
1731 ? 00:00:00 gpm
1733 tty1 00:00:00 bash
1734 tty2 00:00:00 agetty
1735 tty3 00:00:00 agetty
1736 tty4 00:00:00 agetty
1737 tty5 00:00:00 agetty
1738 tty6 00:00:00 agetty
1750 tty1 00:00:00 startx
1762 tty1 00:00:00 xinit
1763 ? 00:00:07 X
1766 tty1 00:00:00 sh
1768 tty1 00:00:00 startkde
1781 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1784 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1786 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1789 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1810 ? 00:00:00 artsd
1812 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1816 tty1 00:00:00 kwrapper
1818 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1819 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1821 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1823 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1826 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1827 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1830 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1834 ? 00:00:00 korgac
1835 ? 00:00:00 kgpg
1906 ? 00:00:00 dhcpcd
1936 ? 00:00:00 run-mozilla.sh
1942 ? 00:00:05 mozilla-bin
1977 ? 00:00:00 esd
1989 ? 00:00:00 aterm
1990 pts/1 00:00:00 bash
2005 pts/1 00:00:00 ps

Looks pretty unix-y to me.

As far as purchase box sets or donate you assumption is correct Obi-Wan. However, the 2 Redhat Enterprise AS STD 5 packs that we just purchased for our company at over $6,000 (that's $12,000) each is more than enough "donation". Now if they didn't give winehq any of that money... oh well. Also I think you read too much into the statement about WINE.. I don't use it so I am not going to pay for it. If I was going to pay for it I would purchase CrossOver or WINEX. And please don't be nieve enough to believe that neither of those distros pay no money to WINE for using their source code.
Oh and I don't really consider "Get Drunk" to be cursing.

So anyway... as STABLE version of WINE integrated into the install or "optioned-in" and ogle.
 
Old 02-18-2004, 11:04 AM   #22
ferreter
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: USA, IL
Distribution: Debian/Gentoo/Slack
Posts: 215

Rep: Reputation: 30
I think that the framebuffer mode in general is rather flakey. It works w/ some live CDs on my machine but always causes issues when being installed to my box. My recommendation is to definately include swaret and checkinstall with a mini-howto on using them both to manage packages on your machine. But then again those are personal preferences.

I'd really like to see some smaller things implemented, like creating the sudo group or chmod 666 /dev/hdc (cdrom) on install but I guess if I didn't know how to do those things myself I wouldn't be much of a candiate for Slack anyways
 
Old 02-18-2004, 07:49 PM   #23
laydros
Member
 
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Raleigh, NC, US
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 63

Rep: Reputation: 15
grub is tougher to config. i would like to see it as an option though. it is slowly going to completely replace lilo. all i care to see for now is the option to use grub instead of lilo, and a setup for it during the install, and ncurses setup like liloconfig. i now know lilo pretty well, but i still like having liloconfig around, for speed if nothing else.

wms is an odd thing. WM and xfce definatly need to stay. i really like that now you can install slack with no kde or gnome and still just use one cd, but you have WM and xfce.

i personally use gnome because it feels like the most advanced gui ive used. its broken all to hell and missing a lot of important things, but i like the feel of it better than windows, kde, or even osx. it works well for me. kde is much faster with 3.2, but i still don't like seeing SO MANY options. i used to use kde, and see lots of wonderful things about it, but no reason to drop gnome.

if they drop gnome there is just as much reason to drop kde. both are big and not really nessicary.


Last edited by laydros; 02-18-2004 at 07:54 PM.
 
Old 02-18-2004, 10:30 PM   #24
ferreter
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: USA, IL
Distribution: Debian/Gentoo/Slack
Posts: 215

Rep: Reputation: 30
Quote:
Originally posted by laydros
if they drop gnome there is just as much reason to drop kde. both are big and not really necessary.
So it was once said that anything over 640k of memory wasn't necessary either
 
Old 02-18-2004, 10:33 PM   #25
moeminhtun
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Singapore
Distribution: Fedora Core 6
Posts: 647

Rep: Reputation: 30
If you don't like big things, why don't you use "core Linux" then?
 
Old 02-19-2004, 01:37 AM   #26
Quivver
LQ Newbie
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Posts: 23

Rep: Reputation: 15
Newbie support!

If your a newbie like i am you have to do a lot of reading and a lot of printing, and researching i've reinstalled windows 3 times now, because of problems with getting my printer to work, and security reasons. You have to really want to learn slackware to be motivated to work with the command line structure, i think its cool so i don't mind getting only 1 or 2 things done in like 12 to 14 hours i have that time to burn some people dont! I hope that this dosnt go against the whole stay as close to unix as possible slogan they have. Thats what i would like to see in 9.2! Make it easyier for people to jump in. Maybe some tutoial in the startx GUI, that can actually break down what they are looking at because we all know that if they are coming from windows that they including me are going to need some hand feeding in order to make this thing work.
 
Old 02-20-2004, 09:21 PM   #27
Samsara
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Distribution: Ubuntu, Mac OS X Tiger
Posts: 481

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 32
Quote:
Originally posted by subekk0
bash-2.05b# ps -A
PID TTY TIME CMD
1781 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1784 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1786 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1789 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1812 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1818 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1819 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1821 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1823 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1826 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1827 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
1830 ? 00:00:00 kdeinit
Tell me what these are? Erm, let me see, 1781 konqueror? 1784 apollon?

See what I mean? Which one would you kill if e.g. konqueror got stuck?

Samsara
 
Old 02-20-2004, 10:45 PM   #28
320mb
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: pikes peak
Distribution: Slackware, LFS
Posts: 2,577

Rep: Reputation: 48
Quote:
Originally posted by zigmund555


This might go abit against being "simple" but allow fstab to add an entry for any win partitions existsing on the HD (although working with fstab is a good learning experience).


LOL, I can see you did not pay attention to the Slackware install menu!
Upon Initial install , the user is given a chance to add any Windows partitions!! If you don't believe me, re-install and check it out.........
 
Old 02-21-2004, 02:49 AM   #29
jong357
Senior Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Distribution: DIYSlackware
Posts: 1,914

Rep: Reputation: 52
Yea, I wish they would give you an option for grub as well.. I can't stand lilo for many reasons... Grub is way easy to use and understand, and is way more versatile options/capabilities wise... I never install a bootloader with slack and then just bootup with the cd and install grub on my own.... While I'm at it..... KDE really bites the big one. never have I seen such overly bloated eye candy in my life. They even have windows beat... And also.... Emacs really SUKS... VI is way better than that crap..... It's late and I have absolutely nothing to contribute to this thread...
 
Old 02-21-2004, 01:19 PM   #30
slightcrazed
Member
 
Registered: May 2003
Location: Lisbon Falls, Maine
Distribution: RH 8.0, 9.0, FC2 - 4, Slack 9.0 - 10.2, Knoppix 3.4 - 4.0, LFS,
Posts: 789

Rep: Reputation: 30
Personally, the only thing I ever wanted to see added to Slack was the ability to compile a fresh kernel during install. Right at the point where it asks you what kernel you want to use it should also ask you if you want to compile a custom kernel, and then pop up menuconfig, let you make changes, and then sit back while it does it's stuff.

A working wine install would be nice, but seeing as how many of us need openGL support compiled into wine I don't think including it with the install would make much sense.



slight
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
just a suggestion muddywaters Linux - Newbie 4 05-26-2005 10:46 PM
suggestion shadowsurfer Linux - Newbie 9 09-25-2004 08:54 PM
Slackware Install Enhancement Suggestion PeteRossi Slackware 2 07-31-2004 09:54 AM
a suggestion :) nautilus_1987 LQ Suggestions & Feedback 3 09-22-2002 04:53 AM
Little Suggestion CARTMAN LQ Suggestions & Feedback 6 05-09-2002 03:44 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:04 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration