LinuxQuestions.org
Visit the LQ Articles and Editorials section
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices



Reply
 
Search this Thread
Old 03-30-2010, 11:28 AM   #1
linus72
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Gordonsville-AKA Mayberry-Virginia
Distribution: PocketWriter/MinimalX
Posts: 5,084

Rep: Reputation: 336Reputation: 336Reputation: 336Reputation: 336
Stable 13 kernel vs Current kernel in Stable system


I was just wondering if there would be any issues using the current 2.6.33 kernel in my 13 stable system?

Vs using the 2.6.29.6 kernel I have now

Are there any big differences in performance, etc?

thanks
 
Old 03-30-2010, 01:44 PM   #2
manwichmakesameal
Member
 
Registered: Aug 2006
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 800

Rep: Reputation: 100Reputation: 100
The only thing that I know of would be kms for radeon. I wouldn't just grab the package and install it though. Just grab the config for 2.6.33 and rebuild it on your stable system.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-31-2010, 05:21 PM   #3
piratesmack
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2009
Distribution: Slackware, Arch
Posts: 518

Rep: Reputation: 133Reputation: 133
I'm running 2.6.31.1 (self-compiled) on Slackware 13 with no problems.
If you decide to use the current package, don't install the kernel headers. You need the headers your glibc was compiled with.

My hard drive used to make a popping sound when I rebooted with the default kernel, but not with 2.6.31.1.

Last edited by piratesmack; 03-31-2010 at 09:40 PM.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-31-2010, 06:21 PM   #4
Didier Spaier
Senior Member
 
Registered: Nov 2008
Location: Paris, France
Distribution: Slackware{,64}-{14.1,current} on a Lenovo Thinkpad W520
Posts: 4,676

Rep: Reputation: 1239Reputation: 1239Reputation: 1239Reputation: 1239Reputation: 1239Reputation: 1239Reputation: 1239Reputation: 1239Reputation: 1239
I guess you meant 2.6.33.1 ?
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 03-31-2010, 10:25 PM   #5
TSquaredF
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2005
Location: "The South Coast of Texas"
Distribution: Slackware64-current
Posts: 492
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 55
I have just stepped back from -current to -13.0 on my Toshiba laptop. This morning I decided to try the kernel packages from -current (less the Header pkg). I have only had it working for about 10 hours now, but I have had no problems.
Regards,
Bill
 
1 members found this post helpful.
Old 04-01-2010, 07:14 AM   #6
linus72
Guru
 
Registered: Jan 2009
Location: Gordonsville-AKA Mayberry-Virginia
Distribution: PocketWriter/MinimalX
Posts: 5,084

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 336Reputation: 336Reputation: 336Reputation: 336
Thanks for the answers guys

Now, I dont know much about the kernel headers....?

So, if I use the 2.6.33 headers in my stable setup, there would be issues due to glibc?

like an example: lets say I installed a slack 2.6.33 kernel into my SourceMage setup (which I did
and SourceMage uses gcc 4.3.3 and Current uses gcc 4.4.3 is that bad?

I am ignorant of any conflicts due to headers; so can someone help out?

Whats important with the kernel headers? gcc or glibc or what?

any help appreciated!
 
Old 04-01-2010, 08:45 AM   #7
bgeddy
Senior Member
 
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Liverpool - England
Distribution: slackware64 13.37 and -current, Dragonfly BSD
Posts: 1,810

Rep: Reputation: 227Reputation: 227Reputation: 227
Traditionally the version of kernel headers you have installed should be those that glibc is built against and so you are not recommended to change these when installing a new kernel. Alien Bob explains this here.

There has recently been a very thorough discussion on this on the Forum here as upgrades to the Slackware kernels at first seem to go against this advice. As a rule I think it's safe to say just keep your kernel headers that you originally installed unless changing glibc.
 
1 members found this post helpful.
  


Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
stable:2.6.32.7 from kernel.org is really stable? miros84 Linux - Software 2 02-02-2010 02:44 AM
what is the current stable Kernel for Slack 10.2? alex1986 Linux - Kernel 4 08-01-2006 05:38 PM
Broad question: Is kernel 2.6.9 really stable? What is the best 2.6.x kernel? jtp51 Slackware 16 10-27-2004 01:29 PM
Kernel 2.4 or 2.6? Which is more stable? make Linux - General 6 06-22-2004 09:41 PM
Installing KDE3.1.3 on stable system using the "stable" mirror at download.kde.org preben Debian 8 08-28-2003 08:02 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
identi.ca: @linuxquestions
Facebook: linuxquestions Google+: linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration