LinuxQuestions.org
Help answer threads with 0 replies.
Home Forums Tutorials Articles Register
Go Back   LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware
User Name
Password
Slackware This Forum is for the discussion of Slackware Linux.

Notices


Reply
  Search this Thread
Old 06-02-2005, 11:03 PM   #1
nin881
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Moorhead MN
Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10
Posts: 59

Rep: Reputation: 15
Slow Comp


I have a AMD k62 400 processor and 92 megs of ram and she is slow. I am running slackware 10.0 and it runs faster than anything that I have put on it. It still is a little slow, is it the RAM that is holding my back or is it just my processing speed.

I'm running KDE just because I like it better. I tried fluxbox and it does work faster but mozilla still runs choppy.

Thanks,
Tom
 
Old 06-02-2005, 11:06 PM   #2
Namaseit
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 325

Rep: Reputation: 30
Try XFCE? It's really lean and featurefull. Otherwise yes, I'd say RAM is partially holding you back. It also could be your HDD. 5400RPM or 4200?
 
Old 06-03-2005, 02:48 AM   #3
mjjzf
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Valby, Denmark / Citizen of the Web
Distribution: Slackware 14.1
Posts: 879

Rep: Reputation: 39
That is a very small RAM frame to work from, if you use KDE - it must swap terribly. I second the suggestion with XFCE.
 
Old 06-03-2005, 11:43 AM   #4
gbonvehi
Senior Member
 
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Argentina (SR, LP)
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 3,145

Rep: Reputation: 53
Another easy to use WM that's very lightweight (and similar to Windows interface) is IceWM, you can find it at: http://icewm.org
 
Old 06-03-2005, 12:30 PM   #5
killerbob
Member
 
Registered: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, ON
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 662

Rep: Reputation: 31
I use XFCE, even on my desktop which has more than enough muscle to run KDE/Gnome. It's faster, and more responsive.

Other than that, yeah, I'd say that your problem is caused by lack of RAM. That thing takes PC100? You can get that dirt cheap, especially if you buy second-hand. I'd suggest you call around your local trailing edge-type computer stores. Even if it recommends PC133, you can put PC100 in there. In your RAM range, an increase from 92mb (actually 96mb with 4mb shared, no?) of PC133 to 256mb of PC100 will produce a significant performance improvement. It's not until you get into the range where you don't need swap for regular use that you see a hit from slower memory, and for most of us, that's in the >512mb range.
 
Old 06-03-2005, 03:34 PM   #6
nin881
Member
 
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Moorhead MN
Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10
Posts: 59

Original Poster
Rep: Reputation: 15
I believe that I have XFCE intalled so I'll try that. I also kind of like Fluxbox but I Have no idea how customize it. Are there any help files for it?

I'll also try swapping out some RAM from my athlon system. I believe the ram works in both.

Thanks,
Tom
 
Old 06-03-2005, 05:42 PM   #7
Namaseit
Member
 
Registered: Dec 2003
Distribution: Slackware
Posts: 325

Rep: Reputation: 30
You mean you want to add themes or just change the menu? If you wanna change the menu its in like /usr/X11R6/share/fluxbox/menu. As well there is other files in there that you can edit. Also a styles directory where I assume you add new themes and such.
 
Old 06-03-2005, 06:34 PM   #8
masonm
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Following the white rabbit
Distribution: Slackware64 -current
Posts: 2,300

Rep: Reputation: 90
I really like fluxbox myself. You can learn everything you need to know about it by reading the documentation on their website http://fluxbox.sourceforge.net/
 
Old 06-03-2005, 07:02 PM   #9
Shade
Senior Member
 
Registered: Mar 2003
Location: Burke, VA
Distribution: RHEL, Slackware, Ubuntu, Fedora
Posts: 1,418
Blog Entries: 1

Rep: Reputation: 46
Code:
~/.fluxbox/menu
...is where you can edit the menu. It's pretty straightforward.

92MB ram is a little skimpy to be running KDE. I think KDE lists its requirements at 128. Bump up the ram and you'll likely see less swap usage, which = much faster experience.

--Shade
 
  


Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to do: using a linux comp to act as router for a windows comp grimhammer Linux - Networking 8 02-10-2005 09:56 PM
Best distro and WM for slow (466 celeron) comp? rcrules Linux - Hardware 3 08-27-2004 10:55 PM
Slow 2.6.x on my comp sandage Linux - Software 2 07-18-2004 11:16 AM
Why do Tux Racer and Chromium run so slow on my pimped out comp??? Bensoft Kill MS Linux - Games 19 10-10-2003 04:06 AM
Which Distro for slow comp? ubers0ldat Linux - Newbie 40 07-24-2003 08:05 PM

LinuxQuestions.org > Forums > Linux Forums > Linux - Distributions > Slackware

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:53 PM.

Main Menu
Advertisement
My LQ
Write for LQ
LinuxQuestions.org is looking for people interested in writing Editorials, Articles, Reviews, and more. If you'd like to contribute content, let us know.
Main Menu
Syndicate
RSS1  Latest Threads
RSS1  LQ News
Twitter: @linuxquestions
Open Source Consulting | Domain Registration